-
Paramount's CinemaCon charm offensive gets lukewarm reception
-
Game over: Players press EU to ban 'destroying' video titles
-
Churches to the rescue of Cuba's legions of poor
-
In Trump era, fearful left-leaning Americans turn to guns
-
Pope brings Africa tour to Angola as Trump feud drags on
-
Fitzpatrick charges to one-shot lead at RBC Heritage
-
Andreeva sinks Swiatek to meet top seed Rybakina in Stuttgart semis
-
Carrick won't rule out Rashford return to Man Utd
-
Lampard restores reputation by leading Coventry to Premier League
-
'Gouged': World Cup fans to pay 'insane' $150 for NY stadium train ticket
-
Lens leave it late to edge Toulouse and keep pressure on PSG
-
Inter swat aside Cagliari to continue Serie A title procession
-
'Gouged': World Cup fans to pay $150 for NY stadium train ticket
-
Thunder stay in the moment as NBA title repeat beckons
-
US Catholics unsettled by Trump's feud with pope
-
US Supreme Court sides with Chevron in environmental case
-
World Cup fans to pay $150 for NY stadium train ticket: official
-
Gujarat's Gill consigns Kolkata to fifth defeat in IPL
-
Top takeaways from CinemaCon: the year's hottest movies
-
Lebanon president says working on 'permanent agreements' after Israel truce
-
Top-seeded Pistons embrace underdog tag
-
Andreeva sinks Swiatek to reach Stuttgart semis
-
Genital mutilation: the silent suffering of Colombia's Indigenous girls
-
UEFA probe after photographers injured at Bayern-Real game
-
Trump tells AFP 'no sticking points' for deal with Iran
-
Trump tells AFP Iran deal close, 'no sticking points' left
-
Shippers eye Iran Hormuz reopening with wariness
-
France, UK to lead 'defensive' force for Hormuz
-
Fils takes out Musetti to reach Barcelona Open semis
-
Griezmann soaking up last Atletico moments before 'joy' of Copa final
-
Polish stadium cancels Kanye West concert
-
Lille's Bentaleb out after 'minor surgery' for infection
-
Oil plunges, stocks jump as Iran declares Hormuz open
-
Trump signals Iran deal near, hails 'brilliant day for world'
-
Zverev fights past Cerundolo to reach Munich semis
-
France, UK to lead multinational Hormuz mission
-
Vondrousova in trouble after shutting door on doping officer
-
Stranded seafarers endure costly path home from Gulf
-
Iran declares Hormuz open as Lebanon ceasefire begins
-
Pope Leo comes into his own with Trump spat
-
Alcaraz withdraws from Madrid Masters after wrist injury
-
Arteta tells spluttering Arsenal to embrace title pressure ahead of Man City showdown
-
Chelsea star Caicedo signs seven-year contract extension
-
Key Atlantic current could weaken more than expected: study
-
Destruction, hope in south Beirut as Lebanese return home
-
Trump say Iran blockade continues despite Hormuz reopening
-
Oil plunges, stocks jumps as Iran declares Hormuz open
-
International law 'matters more than ever' in chaotic world: UN head
-
Turkey hosts latest diplomatic push on Middle East war
-
Frenchwoman who married GI sweetheart returns home after ICE ordeal
UK court rules Apple abused App Store dominance
Apple lost a UK lawsuit Thursday which accuses the US tech giant of abusing the dominant position of its App Store, with claimants seeking more than £1.5 billion ($2 billion) in damages.
The Competition Appeal Tribunal found that Apple shut out competition in the app distribution market and charged app developers "excessive and unfair" commissions.
Apple said it "strongly disagrees" with the ruling and intends to appeal.
The case was brought by King's College London academic Rachael Kent and the law firm Hausfeld & Co on behalf of millions of UK iPhone and iPad users.
Under UK law, in this type of class action, all potentially affected persons are included in the procedure by default, and may benefit from possible compensation, unless they voluntarily opt out.
In the trial, which opened in January, claimants argued that Apple users were overcharged by the company "due to its ban on rival app store platforms."
They said a 30-percent surcharge that the company "imposes" on apps purchased through Apple's App Store leads to consumers "paying more."
At the heart of the claimants' case was that Apple used the App Store to exclude competitors, forcing users to use its system and boosting profits in the process.
Apple, which had denounced the trial as "baseless", maintained that its App Store "faces vigorous competition from many other platforms."
L.Adams--AT