-
Alcaraz faces Shelton in blockbuster US Open quarter-final
-
UK PM denounces 'politics of poison' after anti-migrant protests
-
Trump threatens sales in US of Canadian aircraft maker Bombardier
-
Comeback queen Zheng strikes again for US Open quarter-final berth
-
Eiffel Tower closed in row over women removed for Hindu group
-
Third absence for injured Hadjar as Lawson fills in again in Spain
-
Willemse replaces Kolbe for Springboks' All Blacks series decider
-
Far-right victory in Germany draws protesters in Berlin
-
Zheng shocks Swiatek in another incredible US Open comeback
-
CapTLX Launches Institutional Gateway to U.S. Private Markets, Expanding Access to Structured Investment Opportunities
-
Andreeva survives in three sets against Potapova
-
Africa's richest man eyes continent's largest IPO
-
Alleged killers of Australian, US surfers go on trial in Mexico
-
Macron, SKorea leader warn at film summit of AI risks to creativity
-
King Charles classes Harry and Meghan as 'private citizens'
-
'Impressive' Alcaraz has Shelton in sights in US Open quarter-final
-
Bowling coach Noffke says Pakistan's off-field issues are nothing new
-
Noosha Aubel a krize v Postupimi: Jak dlouho je ještě možné tolerovat toto selhání vedení?
-
Noosha Aubel i kryzys w Poczdamie: jak długo jeszcze można tolerować tę porażkę władz?
-
Η Noosha Aubel και η κρίση του Πότσνταμ: Για πόσο ακόμα είναι ανεκτή αυτή η διαχειριστική αποτυχία;
-
ヌーシャ・オーベルとポツダムの危機:この指導力の欠如は、いつまで容認され続けるのか?
-
Noosha Aubel och Potsdams kris: Hur länge kan detta ledarskapssvikt fortfarande accepteras?
-
نوشا أوبيل وأزمة بوتسدام: إلى متى سيظل هذا الفشل القيادي مقبولاً؟
-
努莎·奧貝爾與波茨坦的危機:這種領導失職還能容忍多久?
-
누샤 아우벨과 포츠담의 위기: 이러한 리더십 부재는 얼마나 더 용인될 수 있는가?
-
नूशा ऑबेल और पॉट्सडैम का संकट: नेतृत्व की इस विफलता को और कितना सहन किया जा सकता है?
-
Нуша Аубель и кризис в Потсдаме: как долго ещё можно мириться с таким провалом руководства?
-
Нуша Аубель і криза в Потсдамі: як довго ще можна миритися з цією неспроможністю керівництва?
-
Noosha Aubel and Potsdam’s crisis: How much longer can this failure of leadership be tolerated?
-
England quick Archer in 'good place' after injuries
-
US envoy sees 'movement' toward three-way talks with Russia, Ukraine
-
Robots protest rampant AI in Poland
-
Thousands bid farewell to Bosnian Serb war criminal in Belgrade
-
Rare woman director in Venice sees industry backsliding on gender
-
EU chief announces 200-mn-euro investment package for Greenland
-
France, SKorea warn at film summit of AI risks to creativity
-
Lebanon says Israel conducts wave of deadly strikes
-
Z Traders Introduces New Funding Model Designed to Expand Opportunities in Trading
-
Cipheras Group - Apex AI Fund Deploys 290-Billion-Parameter Proprietary Large Language Model
-
Lebanon says 12 killed in strikes as Israel vows to 'remove threats'
-
Germany's Merz 'shocked' by far-right state win but vows to stay course
-
Volkswagen plant to be converted for Israeli defence group
-
UK finance minister Healey pledges strict fiscal discipline as budget looms
-
Israeli rubble-clearing in Gaza could erase 'atrocity crimes' evidence: UN expert
-
Mbappe embraces Ballon d'Or talk after historic World Cup exploits
-
Scorching summer pushes French wine harvest to new historic low
-
Tech firms rally, with eyes on US inflation update
-
Pietersen joins England coaching team ahead of World Cup
-
Jaguar Land Rover to cut 4,000 jobs as European car sector hits skids
-
Germany's triumphant far-right AfD aims fire at Merz
Top rights court rejects former Georgia president's case
The European Court of Human Rights on Thursday rejected appeals of criminal convictions by Georgia's former president Mikheil Saakashvili, finding the trials in his home country had been fair.
Saakashvili was convicted in 2018 of ordering riot police to brutally beat a Georgian MP in 2005, and of wrongly pardoning a group of interior ministry officers for the 2006 murder of a young man, Sandro Girgvliani.
He claimed that his right to a fair trial had been infringed, as the Georgian courts should not have taken at face value incriminating evidence from a former minister and former speaker of parliament, who had both since become his political opponents.
Saakashvili also complained that the judge in the second case had been involved in the original Girgvliani murder trial and could not have been impartial about his pardon for the perpetrators.
He further said he could not have known that the presidential power of pardon was restricted, infringing his right not to be punished without a specific law.
And he argued that both cases had been motivated by political persecution against him, rather than serving justice.
Judges at the ECHR in Strasbourg -- which hears cases involving potential breaches of the European Convention on Human Rights and is separate from the European Union -- dismissed Saakashvili's arguments.
Georgian courts had fairly assessed the reliability of testimony from the former minister and parliament speaker, which was not the only evidence against him, they found.
Meanwhile, the judge Saakashvili complained about had only a technical role in the original Girgvliani murder trial whose convicts the then-president pardoned in which Saakashvili was not himself a defendant, the court said.
The ECHR said that Saakashvili "could reasonably have foreseen that his conduct would render him criminally liable" when agreeing to pardon the convicts in exchange for their silence about aspects of the case that could have harmed him politically.
"It should have been a matter of common sense for Mr Saakashvili, a leading politician with an extensive legal background, to expect that his decision to collude with people who had either committed a murder or conspired to cover it up would have serious consequences," the judges said.
Finally, the European court found that the prosecutions had not been politically motivated.
"The authorities' honest desire had been to bring Mr Saakashvili to justice for his wrongdoings," they said.
"Even the highest-ranking State official was not, as a matter of principle, immune from prosecution".
Georgia's Justice Minister Rati Bregadze said that "the decision of the Strasbourg court proves that Saakashvili's prosecution has fully met European standards".
Saakashvili now has three months to decide whether to request an appeal to the Grand Chamber of the ECHR, failing which Thursday's judgement will become final.
H.Thompson--AT