-
NBA legend Jordan in court as NASCAR anti-trust case begins
-
How coaches reacted to 2026 World Cup draw
-
Glasgow down Sale as Stomers win at Bayonne in Champions Cup
-
Trump takes aim at Europe in new security strategy
-
Witness in South Africa justice-system crimes probe shot dead
-
Tuchel urges England not to get carried away plotting route to World Cup glory
-
Russian ambassador slams EU frozen assets plan for Ukraine
-
2026 World Cup draw is kind to favorites as Trump takes limelight
-
WHO chief upbeat on missing piece of pandemic treaty
-
US vaccine panel upends hepatitis B advice in latest Trump-era shift
-
Ancelotti says Brazil have 'difficult' World Cup group with Morocco
-
Kriecmayr wins weather-disrupted Beaver Creek super-G
-
Ghostwriters, polo shirts, and the fall of a landmark pesticide study
-
Mixed day for global stocks as market digest huge Netflix deal
-
Fighting erupts in DR Congo a day after peace deal signed
-
England boss Tuchel wary of 'surprise' in World Cup draw
-
10 university students die in Peru restaurant fire
-
'Sinners' tops Critics Choice nominations
-
Netflix's Warner Bros. acquisition sparks backlash
-
France probes mystery drone flight over nuclear sub base
-
Frank Gehry: five key works
-
US Supreme Court to weigh Trump bid to end birthright citizenship
-
Frank Gehry, master architect with a flair for drama, dead at 96
-
'It doesn't make sense': Trump wants to rename American football
-
A day after peace accord signed, shelling forces DRC locals to flee
-
Draw for 2026 World Cup kind to favorites as Trump takes center stage
-
Netflix to buy Warner Bros. in deal of the decade
-
US sanctions equate us with drug traffickers: ICC dep. prosecutor
-
Migration and crime fears loom over Chile's presidential runoff
-
French officer charged after police fracture woman's skull
-
Fresh data show US consumers still strained by inflation
-
Eurovision reels from boycotts over Israel
-
Trump takes centre stage as 2026 World Cup draw takes place
-
Trump all smiles as he wins FIFA's new peace prize
-
US panel votes to end recommending all newborns receive hepatitis B vaccine
-
Title favourite Norris reflects on 'positive' Abu Dhabi practice
-
Stocks consolidate as US inflation worries undermine Fed rate hopes
-
Volcanic eruptions may have brought Black Death to Europe
-
Arsenal the ultimate test for in-form Villa, says Emery
-
Emotions high, hope alive after Nigerian school abduction
-
Another original Hermes Birkin bag sells for $2.86 mn
-
11 million flock to Notre-Dame in year since rising from devastating fire
-
Gymnast Nemour lifts lid on 'humiliation, tears' on way to Olympic gold
-
Lebanon president says country does not want war with Israel
-
France takes anti-drone measures after flight over nuclear sub base
-
Signing up to DR Congo peace is one thing, delivery another
-
'Amazing' figurines find in Egyptian tomb solves mystery
-
Palestinians say Israeli army killed man in occupied West Bank
-
McLaren will make 'practical' call on team orders in Abu Dhabi, says boss Brown
-
Stocks rise as investors look to more Fed rate cuts
What is the high seas treaty?
The high seas treaty could be law by the end of the year, affording protection to marine life in the vast swathes of ocean that belong to no one.
The treaty was adopted by UN member states in June 2023. It has been ratified by 31 nations plus the European Union, and comes into force 120 days after its 60th ratification.
But at the UN Ocean Conference this week, hosts France said around 50 countries have ratified the pact, bringing it within reach of enactment.
The United States signed the treaty in 2023 under Joe Biden but is not expected to ratify it while Donald Trump is president.
Here are the key points of the treaty text:
- International waters -
The treaty covers international waters, which fall outside the jurisdiction of any single state, and account for more than 60 percent of the world's oceans.
Specifically, it applies to waters beyond countries' exclusive economic zones, which extend up to 200 nautical miles from the coast.
It also covers what is known as "the Area", shorthand for seabed and subsoil beyond the limits of national jurisdiction. The Area comprises just over half of the planet's seabed.
Once enacted, a decision-making body -- a Conference of the Parties (COP) -- would have to work with regional and global organizations that already oversee different aspects of the oceans.
These include regional fisheries bodies and the International Seabed Authority, the arena where nations are hotly contesting a proposed set of rules to govern deep-sea mining.
Trump's decision to sidestep the authority -- to which the US is not a member -- and issue deep-sea mining permits in international waters has raised tricky questions of jurisdiction.
- Marine protected areas -
Currently, almost all protected marine areas (MPAs) are within national territorial waters.
The treaty, however, allows for these reserves to be created in the open ocean.
Most decisions would be taken by a consensus of the COP, but an MPA can be voted into existence with a three-quarters majority, to prevent deadlock caused by a single country.
One crucial shortcoming: the text does not say how these conservation measures will be monitored and enforced over remote swathes of the ocean -- a task that will fall to the COP.
Some experts say satellites could be used to spot infractions.
Individual countries are already responsible for certain activities on the high seas that they have jurisdiction over, such as those of ships flying their flags.
- Sharing the bounty? -
On the high seas, countries and entities under their jurisdiction will be allowed to collect animal, plant, or microbial matter whose genetic material might prove useful, even commercially.
Scientists, for example, have discovered molecules with the potential to treat cancer or other diseases in microbes scooped up in sediment, or produced by sponges or marine mollusks.
Benefits-sharing of those resources has been a key point of contention between wealthy and poorer nations.
The treaty establishes frameworks for the transfer of marine research technologies to developing countries and a strengthening of their research capacities, as well as open access to data.
But it's left to the COP to decide exactly how any monetary benefits will eventually be shared, with options including a system based on specific commercialized products, or more generalized payment systems.
- Environmental impact studies -
The treaty requires signatories to assess the environmental impacts of planned activities under their control on the high seas before they are authorized in instances when such activities may have more than a minor or transitory effect.
It also calls for countries to assess the potential impact on international waters of activities within national jurisdictions that may cause "substantial pollution" or harm the high sea marine environment.
Ultimately, states are responsible for giving the green light to any potentially harmful activity -- a role NGOs hoped would go to the COP, to make controversial approvals more difficult.
The treaty also requires states to publish updates on an activity's environmental impacts. Approvals can be called into question if unanticipated impacts arise.
Though they are not specifically listed in the treaty, activities that could come under regulation include transport and fishing, as well as more controversial subjects such as deep-sea mining or even geo-engineering initiatives to mitigate global warming.
A.Ruiz--AT