-
Japan rides box office boom into Cannes
-
Trump arrives in China for superpower summit with Xi
-
UK's Catherine on first official foreign trip since cancer diagnosis
-
British scientists among winners of top Spanish award
-
Mbappe can show 'commitment' to Real Madrid: Arbeloa
-
Chinese tech giant Alibaba posts profit drop amid AI drive
-
King Charles lays out Starmer's agenda as PM fights for survival
-
Japan suspend Eddie Jones for verbally abusing officials
-
England drop Crawley for 1st Test against New Zealand
-
Stocks rise ahead of US-China summit as Iran talks stall
-
One trip, one ticket: New EU rules aim to ease train travel
-
SoftBank profit quadruples to $32 bn on AI investments
-
Africa must drop 'victim mentality': mogul Tony Elumelu
-
'Ungovernable' Britain? Once-stable politics in freefall
-
China tech giant Tencent sees Q1 profit jump after AI bets
-
Nissan expects return to profit after huge loss
-
World Cup broadcast deadlock ends up in Indian court
-
Asian stocks mixed on US-Iran impasse, AI setbacks
-
Besieged Starmer seeks to heal Labour divisions in King's Speech
-
After winter storms, fires now threaten Portugal's forests
-
Philippine senator seeks military support to block ICC drug war arrest
-
UK's Catherine on first official foreign trip since cancer revelation
-
'Short of blue-collar workers': Ukraine's battle for labour
-
'Don't understand it, but it looks fun': cricket bowls Japan over
-
Poor planning fuels Bangladesh contraceptive crisis
-
Fugitive financier sought in Malaysian fund scandal seeks Trump's pardon
-
World Cup comes to 'Soccer Town USA,' but locals priced out
-
Don't mention the war: Tucson prepares to welcome Team Iran for World Cup
-
Hosting World Cup evokes powerful memories for Mexico, and raises expectations
-
AI rivalry overshadows push for guardrails at Xi-Trump talks: experts
-
Asian stocks fall on US-Iran impasse, AI setbacks
-
Wembanyama leads Spurs to brink as Timberwolves routed
-
Ronaldo left waiting for Saudi title after goalkeeping gaffe
-
'Not my son's fault': The women bearing the children of Sudan's war rapes
-
'I applied to be pope': Losing grip on reality while using ChatGPT
-
EU to ease train travel with one journey, one ticket rules
-
Quick bowler Brown left out of Australia T20 World Cup squad
-
Los Angeles stadium undergoes World Cup facelift
-
Pacific nation Nauru to change name in break from colonial past
-
Messi still highest-paid player in MLS
-
Paramount defends Warner bid amid California probe
-
5E Advanced Materials Reports Key Fiscal Q3 2026 Commercial and Operational Milestones
-
QumulusAI Establishing Corporate Headquarters in Georgia Tech's Tech Square
-
Veterans With Tax Debt May Qualify for Special IRS Relief - Clear Start Tax Highlights Programs Many Service Members Overlook
-
Aptevo Therapeutics Provides a 1Q26 Business Update; RAINIER on Track for 2026 Completion and Phase 2 Dose Selection
-
Bloomia Holdings, Inc. Announces March 31, 2026 Financial Results
-
Xenetic Biosciences Reports First Quarter 2026 Financial Results and Highlights Continued Advancement of DNase Oncology Platform
-
MIRA Pharmaceuticals Announces Acceptance of Peer-Reviewed SKNY-1 Manuscript Highlighting Oral Obesity and Nicotine Addiction Drug Candidate
-
SMX And the Plastic Reset: How Verified Recycling May Determine the Future Cost of Modern Life
-
The White House Names Peter Arnell as U.S. Chief Brand Architect within the National Design Studio
Overshooting 1.5C risks 'irreversible' climate impact: study
Any breach of what climate scientists agree is the safer limit on global warming would result in "irreversible consequences" for the planet, said a major academic study published on Wednesday.
Even temporarily exceeding 1.5 degrees Celsius before bringing temperatures back down -- a scenario known as an "overshoot" -- could cause sea level rises and other disastrous repercussions that might last millenia.
This "does away with the notion that overshoot delivers a similar climate outcome" to a future where more was done earlier to curb global warming, said Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, who led the study co-authored by 30 scientists.
The findings, three years in the making, are urgent, as the goal of capping global temperature rises at 1.5C above pre-industrial levels is slipping out of reach.
Emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases must nearly halve by 2030 if the world is to reach 1.5C -- the more ambitious target enshrined in the 2015 Paris climate accord.
Currently however, they are still rising.
Some kind of overshoot of 1.5C is increasingly being seen as inevitable by scientists and policymakers.
This new study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature, cautions against "overconfidence" in such a scenario when the dangers are not fully appreciated.
An overshoot could trigger impacts that last hundreds if not thousands of years, or cross "tipping points" that prompt large and unrepairable changes in earth's climate system, the scientists warn.
It could mean the thawing of permafrost and peatlands, carbon-rich landscapes that would release huge volumes of planet-heating greenhouse gases if lost.
And sea levels could rise an additional 40 centimetres (16 inches) if 1.5C is exceeded for a century, the authors said, an existential difference for vulnerable low-level island nations.
"For most climate indicators, there are irreversible consequences due to the temporary exceedance of, for example, the 1.5 degree limit," said Schleussner from the Austria-based International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis.
"Even if you brought temperatures back down again, the world that we are looking at is not the same as if you didn't overshoot."
- Act now -
Taken together, the world's existing pledges for climate action would result in nearly 3C of warming by 2100, according to the UN.
To reach 1.5C, emissions must be at net zero by 2050, which means balancing the amount of carbon dioxide produced against the amount humanity can remove from the atmosphere via technology.
This process, known as carbon removal, would need to be massively scaled up to pull global temperatures back down in the event of an overshoot, something that is far from guaranteed.
"We cannot be confident that temperature decline after overshoot is achievable within the timescales expected today," the authors wrote.
Schleussner said their findings reinforced "the urgency of governments acting to reduce emissions now and not later down the line, to keep peak warming as low as possible".
"If you want to limit the climate risks in an effective manner, the race to net zero needs to be seen for what it is," he said.
W.Nelson--AT