-
Talks in Qatar after US-Iran deal: What we know
-
Potter admits Sweden couldn't live with France in World Cup defeat
-
Tuchel refuses to dampen England World Cup expectations
-
US coach dismisses European jinx ahead of Bosnia clash
-
Mbappe hails unity as France rally around Deschamps at World Cup
-
World Bank to phase out lending to China by 2031
-
Mbappe fires France into World Cup last 16, Norway advance
-
Mbappe scores twice as France breeze past Sweden into World Cup last 16
-
Belgium fully fit ahead of Senegal tie at World Cup, says Garcia
-
No corn dogs? Trump's 'Great American State Fair' threatens to be a flop
-
Tepid outlook weighs on Nike despite tariff refund boost
-
Haaland hailed as 'greatest' after more World Cup heroics
-
DR Congo have 'nothing to lose' in England World Cup clash
-
Koeman steps down as Netherlands coach after World Cup exit
-
Valiant Serena beaten on Wimbledon return, Swiatek survives scare
-
Nasdaq ends best quarter in 6 years as yen extends drop against dollar
-
Serena beaten at Wimbledon in first singles match in four years
-
Zverev says Wimbledon hopes 'about me' despite open draw
-
Dutch football chiefs condemn online racism after World Cup exit
-
Lionel Scaloni: Argentina's mastermind marks 100 games in charge
-
Police hunt for Monaco bomber after Ukraine-born tycoon wounded
-
Mourinho's Real Madrid host Real Sociedad in La Liga opener
-
CIA boss compares cutting-edge AI to nuclear weapons
-
Football brings joy to Venezuelan kids displaced by quakes
-
'Any team can beat you', warns Ruiz as Spain seek end to World Cup woe
-
Haaland fires Norway into last 16 as France, Mexico look to advance
-
Venezuela quake survivors seek food, shelter as toll rises to nearly 2,000
-
Merkel unveils official portrait for German chancellery
-
Haaland scores winner to send Norway into last-16 Brazil clash
-
Canada crews battle northern wildfire after crash kills 3
-
US Treasury sanctions target alleged drug cartel-linked fuel smuggling ring
-
Portugal's Silva bides his time after being benched at World Cup
-
LeBron James to leave Lakers to play 24th NBA season
-
US stars relish soccer's primetime moment against Bosnia
-
Zverev wins in four sets to reach Wimbledon round two
-
Lampard extends Coventry stay after promotion to Premier League
-
Grimaldo realises goal of Atletico Madrid move from Leverkusen
-
Djokovic, Sinner aim to step up Wimbledon title chase
-
US Supreme Court lifts campaign spending restrictions ahead of midterms
-
Brook ready for "great honour" of succeeding Stokes as Test skipper
-
LeBron James to leave Lakers to play 24th NBA career
-
Taps run dry in Hungarian village as heatwave bites
-
Tens of millions swelter as heat wave blasts US
-
Venezuela quake survivors seek food, shelter amid risk of disease outbreaks
-
US Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to limit birthright citizenship
-
LeBron James to leave Lakers, continue NBA career - media reports
-
Gardner stars as Australia thrash the West Indies in Women's T20 World Cup semi-final
-
'Where is she?' The desperate search for Venezuela's missing
-
Former Barca teen star Fati seals permanent Monaco switch
-
No business as usual after shock World Cup exit, say German FA
Australia ban offers test on social media harm
Australia's under-16 social media ban will make the nation a real-life laboratory on how best to tackle the technology's impact on young people, experts say.
Those in favour of the world-first December 10 ban point to a growing mass of studies that suggest too much time online takes a toll on teen wellbeing.
But opponents argue there is not enough hard proof to warrant the new legislation, which could do more harm than good.
Adolescent brains are still developing into the early 20s, said psychologist Amy Orben, who leads a digital mental health programme at the University of Cambridge.
A "huge amount" of observational research, often based on surveys, has tracked a correlation between teen tech use and worse mental health, she told AFP.
But it is hard to draw firm conclusions, because phones are so ingrained into daily life, and young people may turn to social media because they are already suffering.
"With technology, because it's changing so fast, the evidence base will always be uncertain," Orben said.
"What could change the dial are experimental studies or evaluations of natural experiments. So evaluating the Australia ban is hugely important because it actually gives us a window on what might be happening."
- No 'smoking gun' -
To try and shed light on the cause-and-effect relationship, Australian researchers are recruiting 13- to 16-year-olds for a "Connected Minds Study" to assess how the ban affects their wellbeing.
A World Health Organization survey last year found that 11 percent of adolescents struggled to control their use of social media.
Other research has shown a link between excessive social media use and poor sleep, body image, school performance and emotional distress, such as a 2019 study of US schoolchildren in JAMA Psychiatry that found those who spent over three hours a day on social media could be at heightened risk for mental health problems.
So some experts argue the right time to act is now.
"I actually don't think this is a science issue. This is a values issue," said Christian Heim, an Australian psychiatrist and clinical director of mental health.
"We're talking about things like cyberbullying, the risk of suicide, accessing sites on anorexia nervosa and self-harm," he told AFP.
Evidence of a risk is growing, Heim said -- pointing to a 2018 study by neuroscientist Christian Montag that linked addiction to the Chinese messaging app WeChat to shrinking grey matter volume in part of the brain.
"We can't wait for stronger evidence," Heim said.
Scott Griffiths of the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences said a "smoking gun research study" was unlikely to emerge soon to prove the harms of social media.
But the ban was worth trying, he said.
"I'm hopeful that the major social media companies seeing this full-throated legislative action come into play will finally be motivated to more meaningfully protect the health and wellbeing of young people."
- 'Too blunt' -
More than three-quarters of Australian adults agreed with the new legislation before it passed, a poll indicated.
However, an open letter signed by more than 140 academics, campaigners and other experts cautioned that a ban would be "too blunt an instrument".
"People were saying: 'Well, kids are getting more anxious. There must be a reason -- let's ban social media'," argued one signatory, Axel Bruns, a digital media professor at Queensland University of Technology.
Children may simply have more reasons to be anxious, under pressure from pandemic-interrupted schooling and troubled by wars in Gaza and Ukraine, he told AFP.
And a ban might push some teens to more extreme, fringe sites, while preventing other marginalised young people from finding community.
Noelle Martin, an activist focused on image-based online abuse and deepfakes, feared the Australian ban would do little to help, given the country's history on enforcement of existing laws.
"I don't believe it will stop, prevent or do much to meaningfully combat this issue," Martin said.
In any case, the political decision has been taken in Australia.
"Social media is doing social harm to our children," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said this year.
"There is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it."
O.Ortiz--AT