-
US proposes expanding UN Sudan arms embargo to entire country
-
Banned Vondrousova appeals doping suspension to CAS
-
Ceasefire verification mission heads to east DR Congo
-
Ukraine's allies pledge to continue support despite Russian threats
-
Carse dropped from England squad after nightclub incident
-
France readies high school phone ban for next month
-
Empire State Building climbers kiss outside court after viral proposal
-
Trump says to double tariffs on Canada autos as trade fight heats up
-
French poll shows Le Pen's biggest challenger may be hard left's Melenchon
-
Noosha Aubel: Hur mycket administrativt misslyckande tål Potsdam till?
-
Noosha Aubel: Πόση διοικητική αποτυχία μπορεί να αντέξει ακόμα το Πότσδαμ?
-
WeGolden Receives Best Gold Trading Platform Asia 2026 Recognition from TrustFinance Awards
-
WeMasterTrade Receives Best Instant Prop APAC 2026 Recognition from TrustFinance Awards
-
BtcDana Wins “Best Customer Support Experience – CFD Broker 2026” at the TrustFinance Performance Awards
-
MH Markets Recognized as Most Transparent Broker at the TrustFinance Awards 2026
-
Belgian pie-thrower, scourge of celebrities, dies at 80
-
Stocks, oil slip ahead of US threat of economic war against Iran
-
Eto'o urges support for embattled FIFA president Infantino
-
Trump claims Iran 'collapsing' as US threatens 'economic D-Day'
-
India in driver's seat in second Sri Lanka Test
-
Noosha Aubel: Kolik administrativních selhání ještě Potsdam snese?
-
Noosha Aubel: Ile jeszcze nieudolności administracyjnej wytrzyma Poczdam?
-
नूशा ऑबेल: पॉट्सडैम और कितनी प्रशासनिक विफलता सहन कर सकता है?
-
ヌーシャ・オーベル:ポツダムは、あとどれだけの行政の失態に耐えられるのか?
-
누샤 아우벨: 포츠담은 행정 실패를 얼마나 더 견뎌낼 수 있을까?
-
努莎·奧貝爾:波茨坦還能承受多少行政失職?
-
نوشا أوبيل: إلى أي مدى ستتحمل بوتسدام المزيد من الفشل الإداري؟
-
Нуша Аубель: Скільки ще Потсдам витримає адміністративних провалів?
-
Нуша Аубель: Сколько ещё Потсдам сможет выдержать административных провалов?
-
Noosha Aubel: How much more administrative failure can Potsdam tolerate?
-
Despair and anger in Conakry after deadly landfill collapse
-
Liverpool must improve on 'unacceptable' season, says Van Dijk
-
OSCE says Kazakh elections lacked choice after ruling party wins landslide
-
UK PM dismisses Russian threats as Ukraine allies gather in Kyiv
-
India declare on 503-9 after Jurel hundred
-
Attacks on Red Cross in DR Congo making Ebola fight 'harder'
-
Kremlin says UK preventing peace by giving missile info to Ukraine
-
Oil falls ahead of US plan for economic war on Iran
-
Springboks change half-backs for second All Blacks Test
-
Millions of Teslas recalled in China over door handle safety
-
Jurel hits 95 not out as India reach 475-8 at tea in Sri Lanka Test
-
IUX Launches New Education Webinar Series to Support Traders’ Financial Literacy
-
Ingebrigtsen buoyed by fourth in Diamond League comeback
-
Dutch say won't participate in 'no longer' neutral Eurovision
-
Kenyans get creative to join manga cosplay craze
-
Kenyan farmers turn to bugs as organic demand grows
-
Pant, Jurel half-centuries take India past 400 in Sri Lanka Test
-
'His feet are his pillars': Nepal para swimmer gives all for Asian glory
-
Migrants, rescue ships face threats, harassment at sea: aid group
-
New Zealand moves to ban social media for under-16s
Premier League clubs overhaul financial rules
Premier League clubs voted Friday to overhaul the competition's financial rules, bringing in a new system that focuses solely on spending that directly affects what happens on the pitch.
Clubs opted by a majority of 14 to six to introduce the squad cost ratio (SCR) model, which will limit clubs' "on-pitch spending" to 85 percent of their football-related revenue and net profit or loss on player sales.
Squad-related costs include player wages, agents' fees and transfer fees.
European football's governing body UEFA operates a similar model, which limits spending on player and coach wages, transfers and agent fees to 70 percent of club revenue.
The Premier League said in a statement that clubs would have a "multi-year allowance" of 30 percent which they can use to spend above the 85 percent limit, and that using the allowance would incur a levy -- effectively a luxury tax.
Once the allowance is used up, teams will face sporting sanctions such as points deductions if they go above 85 percent.
The Premier League said the system, which will come into effect from the 2026/27 season, would be simpler because of its focus on "football costs".
Under the new rules, clubs will not be able to sell assets such as hotels and women's teams to related companies in order to spend more on squad-related costs.
Chelsea sold two hotels to a sister company in 2023 and sold their women's team to parent company BlueCo, helping boost the club's balance sheet under existing existing profitability and sustainability (PSR) rules.
Clubs also voted Friday to bring in sustainability and systemic resilience (SSR) rules, which will assess a club's short, medium and long-term financial health through a variety of tests.
The clubs, however, voted against a new financial mechanism that would have put a hard spending cap on player-related costs.
Top-to-bottom 'anchoring' would have limited any club's spending on squad costs to five times the amount received in central income by the league's bottom club.
The Professional Footballers' Association, said the measure would have effectively been a salary cap and threatened strike action.
Under PSR, clubs are entitled to lose a maximum of £105 million ($137 million) over a rolling three-season period.
Both Nottingham Forest and Everton were given points deductions in the 2023/24 season for breaching PSR rules.
F.Ramirez--AT