-
Wizards choose teenage talent Dybantsa with No.1 pick in NBA Draft
-
Golden Boot battle steals the show at World Cup
-
Tuchel insists England remain on course at World Cup despite Ghana draw
-
Red or green? For Brazil, the politics of World Cup kits matter
-
Bellingham rues England's 'second game fever' after Ghana draw
-
US Congress passes landmark housing affordability bill
-
Meta offers lower cost glasses as wearables competition heats up
-
Dream job: US soccer fans paid to watch every World Cup game
-
England left frustrated by Ghana in World Cup draw
-
Europe wilts under record heat as AC sales soar
-
Grieving Deschamps to miss France's final World Cup group game
-
Rubio rejects Iran tolls on Hormuz as deal strains multiply
-
Two-goal Ronaldo delights in silencing critics after 'attacks'
-
Cubans bid farewell to revolution hero Valdes
-
Morocco squad 'supporting' Hakimi despite impending rape trial
-
Ronaldo delights in silencing 'attacks' after making World Cup history
-
Airbus to inspect 16 A380s after cracks found on plane wings
-
'Paris in this heat is awful': Tourists change plans as sites close early
-
Bolivian government says cleared all protest roadblocks
-
'I'm back': Ronaldo scores at sixth World Cup as Portugal run riot
-
France has hottest-ever day as 'unbearable' heatwave keeps scorching Europe
-
US TV news host begs for info after kidnap note says mother is dead
-
Ronaldo double fires Portugal, England eye last 32
-
Ronaldo scores at sixth World Cup as Portugal run riot
-
Hollywood powerhouses bring AI fight to Europe
-
Portugal's Ronaldo first man to score at six World Cups
-
What is driving Europe's heatwave?
-
Rubio says US will not accept Iranian tolls on Hormuz
-
Spain's Oyarzabal happy to play through pain at World Cup
-
Marco Rubio in Gulf to reassure allies hit hard by Mideast war
-
US Supreme Court rules against man whose dreadlocks were cut off in prison
-
American Michele Kang agrees deal to buy French club Lyon
-
UN to begin evacuating stranded Mideast sailors after US-Iran talks
-
French farmers suffer arid crops, heat-stricken animals
-
Tech drags down world stocks, oil dips on supply hopes
-
Scorching heat shuts Paris landmarks early as France swelters
-
Shootout traps tourists at Rio sunrise lookout
-
Ipswich hire Gary O'Neil as manager
-
Heatwave sparks health warnings across Europe
-
Lake wins Wales captaincy race ahead of Morgan
-
Hundreds of schools close as UK braces for record-breaking heatwave
-
Tech names drag down world stocks, oil dips on supply hopes
-
Starmer vows 'orderly' transition as Labour MPs mull bid to be PM
-
Reports of Dupont inclusion in France squad 'bordering on annoying' says Galthie
-
ACTIVIST SHAREHOLDER FILES SCHEDULE 13D IN EQUUS TOTAL RETURN, INC.
-
England coach McCullum denies rift with 'good friend' Stokes
-
Europe: the world's fastest-warming continent
-
Taliban officials hold EU migration talks in Brussels
-
Gennaro Gattuso returns to coaching with Lazio after Italy debacle
-
Kenya halts US Ebola facility: health minister tells court
Jury told that Meta, Google 'engineered addiction' at landmark US trial
Meta and Google-owned YouTube were accused Monday of pushing highly addictive apps on children as a landmark social media trial began in earnest in a California court.
The blockbuster trial in front of a Los Angeles jury could establish a legal precedent on whether the social media juggernauts deliberately designed their platforms to lead to addiction in children.
The proceedings are expected to see Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg on the stand next week and Instagram boss Adam Mosseri in the courtroom as early as Wednesday. In addition to Instagram, Meta's platforms include Facebook and WhatsApp.
"This case is about two of the richest corporations in history who have engineered addiction in children's brains," plaintiffs' attorney Mark Lanier told the jury in his opening statement.
"This case is as easy as A-B-C," Lanier said as he stacked children's toy blocks bearing the letters.
He contended the A was for addicting, the B for brains and the C for children.
"They don't only build apps; they build traps," Lanier said, saying Meta and YouTube pursued "addiction by design," making his arguments using props like a toy Ferrari and a mini slot machine.
Meta attorney Paul Schmidt countered in opening remarks to the jury that evidence will show problems with the plaintiff's family and real-world bullying took a toll on her self-esteem, body image and happiness rather than Instagram.
"If you took Instagram away and everything else was the same in Kaley's life, would her life be completely different, or would she still be struggling with the same things she is today?" Schmidt asked, pointing out an Instagram addiction is never mentioned in medical records included in the evidence.
The trial before Judge Carolyn Kuhl focuses on allegations that a 20-year-old woman identified as Kaley G.M. suffered severe mental harm because she became addicted to social media as a child.
The case is being treated as a bellwether proceeding because its outcome could set the tone, and the level of payouts to successful plaintiffs, for a tidal wave of similar litigation across the United States.
Social media firms are accused in hundreds of lawsuits of leading young users to become addicted to content and suffer from depression, eating disorders, psychiatric hospitalization and even suicide.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs are borrowing strategies used in the 1990s and 2000s against the tobacco industry, which faced a similar onslaught of lawsuits arguing that companies knowingly sold a harmful product.
Lanier told the jurors that Kaley began watching YouTube at six years old because the company never told her mother "the goal was viewer addiction," or that toddlers as young as two were being targeted despite "critical" risk of addiction.
"This is the first time that a social media company has ever had to face a jury for harming kids," Social Media Victims Law Center founder Matthew Bergman, whose team is involved in more than 1,000 such cases, told AFP.
- 'Strongly disagree' -
Internet titans have argued that they are shielded by Section 230 of the US Communications Decency Act, which frees them from responsibility for what social media users post.
However, this case argues that those firms are culpable for business models designed to hold people's attention and to promote content that can harm their mental health.
The plaintiffs said they would call expert witnesses that will argue that young people's brains are not yet developed to withstand the powers of the algorithms being flung at them on Instagram and YouTube.
The company pointed to recent efforts to provide more safeguards for young people, adding that "we're always working to do better."
Jose Castaneda, a YouTube spokesperson, said "the allegations in these complaints are simply not true."
Lawyers for YouTube are to present opening remarks to the jury on Tuesday.
Snapchat and TikTok were named as defendants in the suit, but struck settlement deals before the start of the trial. The terms were not disclosed.
Lawsuits, including some brought by school districts, accusing social media platforms of practices endangering young users are making their way through federal court in northern California and state courts across the country.
A separate lawsuit accusing Meta of putting profit over the wellbeing of young users was also getting under way in New Mexico on Monday.
G.P.Martin--AT