-
Trump says Iran meeting set in Qatar, despite uncertainty
-
Paraguay shock Germany as Brazil, Morocco advance at World Cup
-
Morocco down Netherlands to reach World Cup last 16
-
NASA robot mission aiming to rescue space telescope
-
Asian stocks unable to track Wall St higher, yen holds at 40-year low
-
Mouse-that-roared Paraguay savors World Cup win over Germany
-
'We came from nothing': DR Congo dreams of England World Cup upset
-
Taiwan's ageing seaweed harvesters hope younger women wade in
-
Peruvian political heir Fujimori wins presidency
-
Key Venezuela port opens with US aid, as burials begin
-
What to expect as EU small parcel levy kicks in
-
Ambitious Japan search for answers after World Cup exit
-
Nagelsmann says won't 'run away' after Germany World Cup exit
-
How NATO will try to keep Trump happy at Ankara summit
-
Paraguay coach salutes 'extraordinary' World Cup win over Germany
-
Ultra-wealthy Chinese exile in New York sentenced to 30 years for fraud
-
Japan fans stunned as Brazil end their World Cup dream
-
Years on, families bury 68 Indigenous victims of Guatemala civil war
-
'Powerhouse' Haaland leads by example at World Cup: Norway coach Solbakken
-
'Deliberate' Monaco explosion wounds Ukrainian oligarch
-
Sadness and joy as breakaway Catholic group nears schism
-
Paraguay shock Germany, Brazil advance at World Cup
-
Germany dumped out by Paraguay in seismic World Cup shock
-
'I recognized her ring': identifying Venezuela's dead in a makeshift morgue
-
More than 1,000 drones detected since start of World Cup: FBI
-
Tuchel defensive headache as England ready for DR Congo clash
-
Extreme heat warning issued for World Cup host Kansas City
-
US reopens Venezuela port as quake deaths top 1,700
-
Bloodied but unbowed: Sinner, Djokovic survive Wimbledon scares
-
Coach says Japan getting closer to World Cup glory despite defeat
-
Djokovic battles past Wu in 'challenging' Wimbledon first round
-
NBA Grizzlies deal Morant to Portland: report
-
World Bank drops climate finance targets in renewed action plan
-
Sweden ready for 'game of our lives' in France World Cup clash
-
Ancelotti says never doubted 'suffering' Brazil would score
-
MLS Chicago Fire announce signing of Poland's Lewandowski
-
Venezuela's quake-hit La Guaira port 'operational': US military
-
Tech rebound lifts Dow to record, yen hits 40-year low against dollar
-
Martinelli late show as Brazil down Japan to reach World Cup last 16
-
US Supreme Court rules on dragnet searches of cellphone location data
-
Madueke says he can be England's World Cup game-changer
-
South Korea fans target coach Hong with boos as World Cup squad returns
-
Switzerland returns famed Benin Bronzes to Nigeria
-
Vaughan calls for England change after Stokes bows out with defeat
-
Last-gasp Brazil down Japan to reach World Cup 16
-
Europe's deadly heatwave scorches east, Slovakia hits record
-
Spain confident despite World Cup injury setbacks, says Llorente
-
French Open champ Andreeva sails into Wimbledon second round
-
Martinelli scores in 95th minute to send Brazil into World Cup last 16
-
Shooter in custody dispute kills six at German family shelter
ICJ sides with E.Guinea in spat with Gabon over oil-rich islands
The top United Nations court on Monday sided with Equatorial Guinea in a decades-long dispute with Gabon over three tiny islands in potentially oil-rich waters.
The two west African nations have been squabbling over the 30-hectare (74-acre) island of Mbanie and two smaller low-lying islets, Cocotiers and Conga, since the early 1970s.
The islands themselves are tiny and virtually uninhabited but lie in an area potentially rich in oil and gas.
The dispute dates all the way back to 1900, when then colonial powers France and Spain signed a treaty in Paris setting out the borders between the two countries.
But Gabon argued that a later treaty, the 1974 Bata Convention, then fixed the islands' sovereignty in their favour.
However, the International Court of Justice ruled that the Bata Convention "invoked by the Gabonese Republic is not a treaty having the force of law... and does not constitute a legal title."
It said that the legal title to the islands was held by Spain, which then passed to Equatorial Guinea upon independence in 1968.
Unlike most countries appearing before the ICJ in The Hague, which rules in disputes between states, Guinea and Equatorial Guinea agreed to ask judges for a ruling in an effort to find an amical solution.
The two countries asked the court to decide which legal texts are valid -- the Paris Treaty of 1900 or the Bata Convention of 1974.
In hearings in October, Equatorial Guinea argued that Gabon invaded the islands in 1972 and had occupied them illegally ever since.
Lawyers for the country rubbished the Bata Convention in the October hearings, saying Gabon suddenly produced the document in 2003, surprising everyone.
"No one had seen or heard of this supposed convention," Domingo Mba Esono, Vice-Minister of Mines and Hydrocarbons from Equatorial Guinea, told ICJ judges.
"Moreover, the document presented was not an original but was only an unauthenticated photocopy," said Esono.
Philippe Sands, a lawyer representing Equatorial Guinea, dismissed the Bata Convention as "scraps of paper".
"You are being asked to rule that a state can rely on a photocopy of a photocopy of a purported document, the original of which cannot be found and of which no mention was made or any reliance placed for three decades," said Sands.
Equatorial Guinea has been asking for an original copy of the Bata Convention since 2003, so far in vain.
- 'Badly managed' -
But Marie-Madeleine Mborantsuo, honorary president of Gabon's constitutional court, argued that the Bata Convention "resolves all sovereignty issues regarding the islands and border delimitation".
She admitted that "sadly, neither of the two parties can find the original document", noting it was drawn up in an era before computers and databases.
"Archives were badly managed because of a number of things -- unfavourable climate, a lack of trained personnel and lack of technology," said Mborantsuo.
The court ruled that neither country seemed to regard the Bata Convention as binding upon them, meaning the court did not consider it the correct title in force.
N.Mitchell--AT