-
Zelensky warns airlines Russian skies not safe due to Ukraine drones
-
Confident Gauff reaches US Open 2nd round with straight-set win
-
UK vows anti-settler measures as Israel warns of retaliation
-
US postal whistleblower warns ballot system could disrupt midterms
-
New pro Koivun among US Presidents Cup picks
-
John Ternus takes over as Apple enters era of AI, foldable phones
-
G20 finance leaders close talks marked by US welcoming Russia
-
Second-ranked Rybakina eases into US Open 2nd round
-
From Hollywood to big time tennis: teen makes US Open debut
-
Man City sign Fernandez, Ndiaye as Premier League clubs set new spending record
-
Man City secure Premier League record deal to sign Fernandez
-
Alcaraz aims to step it up in round two of US Open title defense
-
Kaepernick says NFL 'blackballing me' decade after protest
-
Honduran judge drops corruption charges against ex-leader Hernandez
-
Atletico loan David from Juve, send Lemar to Elche
-
Mudryk joins Spurs on loan from Chelsea after doping ban ends
-
Chelsea 'keeper Sanchez makes deadline-day move to Como
-
What's next after judge strikes down New York's landmark climate fund law
-
Kroenke to buy baseball's Los Angeles Angels: statement
-
Cobolli claws out five-set victory at rain-hit US Open
-
US defends Trump's Venezuela oil deal
-
Ndiaye seizes 'chance of a lifetime' in Man City move
-
OpenAI to launch new model with 'stronger safeguards' after hack
-
Global bond sell-off, surging oil prices send markets into the red
-
Fans mourn 'bittersweet' final Ariana Grande gig in London
-
Zuckerberg, Musk make plea at G20 for more AI data centers
-
Norway's King Haakon VIII swears allegiance to constitution
-
'Discomfort' at G20 finance talks as US hosts Russian minister
-
Syria site infrastructure 'consistent with nuclear reactor': IAEA
-
Man City set to sign Fernandez for record fee, Ndiaye on deadline day
-
Juventus sign Woltemade, Sarr on loan from Premier League
-
Back-to-school in Cuba a grim day with shortages of everything
-
US strikes Iran in latest tit-for-tat attacks
-
Canadian minister says Russia's G20 presence sparked 'discomfort'
-
China's Xi arrives in Egypt as US sanctions threat looms over Iran links
-
IMF reaches agreement with Senegal on new $2.2 bn loan programme
-
Car bomb at Colombian police station kills one, injures 11
-
Germany blames Russia for airport drone incident, hits back with sanctions
-
Rain delays start of play on US Open
-
Iran president urges return to truce, hails Russian support
-
Man City agree blockbuster deal to sign Chelsea star Fernandez: reports
-
Aster and World Liberty Financial Launch USD1 RWA Boost: Phase 1, Offering 125M $WLFI + 6.25M USD1 in Rewards
-
Alkemya Metacore Secures $50M via Tokenised Equity to Scale Nickel Energy and Security Tech
-
Tronchon sprints to Vuelta stage 10 win, Mas keeps red jersey
-
Man City chase Fernandez, Arsenal sell Jesus on deadline day
-
Germany defender Rudiger announces international retirement
-
EU says Russian 'hybrid attacks' won't halt aid to Ukraine
-
Musk defends AI data centers, slams EU rules at G20
-
Explosives used in sabotage attack on German power lines
-
Activists blame Kenya for Ugandan opposition figure's plight
ICJ sides with E.Guinea in spat with Gabon over oil-rich islands
The top United Nations court on Monday sided with Equatorial Guinea in a decades-long dispute with Gabon over three tiny islands in potentially oil-rich waters.
The two west African nations have been squabbling over the 30-hectare (74-acre) island of Mbanie and two smaller low-lying islets, Cocotiers and Conga, since the early 1970s.
The islands themselves are tiny and virtually uninhabited but lie in an area potentially rich in oil and gas.
The dispute dates all the way back to 1900, when then colonial powers France and Spain signed a treaty in Paris setting out the borders between the two countries.
But Gabon argued that a later treaty, the 1974 Bata Convention, then fixed the islands' sovereignty in their favour.
However, the International Court of Justice ruled that the Bata Convention "invoked by the Gabonese Republic is not a treaty having the force of law... and does not constitute a legal title."
It said that the legal title to the islands was held by Spain, which then passed to Equatorial Guinea upon independence in 1968.
Unlike most countries appearing before the ICJ in The Hague, which rules in disputes between states, Guinea and Equatorial Guinea agreed to ask judges for a ruling in an effort to find an amical solution.
The two countries asked the court to decide which legal texts are valid -- the Paris Treaty of 1900 or the Bata Convention of 1974.
In hearings in October, Equatorial Guinea argued that Gabon invaded the islands in 1972 and had occupied them illegally ever since.
Lawyers for the country rubbished the Bata Convention in the October hearings, saying Gabon suddenly produced the document in 2003, surprising everyone.
"No one had seen or heard of this supposed convention," Domingo Mba Esono, Vice-Minister of Mines and Hydrocarbons from Equatorial Guinea, told ICJ judges.
"Moreover, the document presented was not an original but was only an unauthenticated photocopy," said Esono.
Philippe Sands, a lawyer representing Equatorial Guinea, dismissed the Bata Convention as "scraps of paper".
"You are being asked to rule that a state can rely on a photocopy of a photocopy of a purported document, the original of which cannot be found and of which no mention was made or any reliance placed for three decades," said Sands.
Equatorial Guinea has been asking for an original copy of the Bata Convention since 2003, so far in vain.
- 'Badly managed' -
But Marie-Madeleine Mborantsuo, honorary president of Gabon's constitutional court, argued that the Bata Convention "resolves all sovereignty issues regarding the islands and border delimitation".
She admitted that "sadly, neither of the two parties can find the original document", noting it was drawn up in an era before computers and databases.
"Archives were badly managed because of a number of things -- unfavourable climate, a lack of trained personnel and lack of technology," said Mborantsuo.
The court ruled that neither country seemed to regard the Bata Convention as binding upon them, meaning the court did not consider it the correct title in force.
N.Mitchell--AT