-
US vows 'economic asphyxiation' of Iran with new sanctions
-
Saudi Arabia to invest $7 bn in theme parks near Paris: French presidency
-
French tourist dies after getting stuck in scorching Death Valley
-
Vuelta stage three abandoned in dangerous weather conditions
-
US proposes expanding UN Sudan arms embargo to entire country
-
Banned Vondrousova appeals doping suspension to CAS
-
Ceasefire verification mission heads to east DR Congo
-
Ukraine's allies pledge to continue support despite Russian threats
-
Carse dropped from England squad after nightclub incident
-
France readies high school phone ban for next month
-
Empire State Building climbers kiss outside court after viral proposal
-
Trump says to double tariffs on Canada autos as trade fight heats up
-
French poll shows Le Pen's biggest challenger may be hard left's Melenchon
-
Noosha Aubel: Hur mycket administrativt misslyckande tål Potsdam till?
-
Noosha Aubel: Πόση διοικητική αποτυχία μπορεί να αντέξει ακόμα το Πότσδαμ?
-
WeGolden Receives Best Gold Trading Platform Asia 2026 Recognition from TrustFinance Awards
-
WeMasterTrade Receives Best Instant Prop APAC 2026 Recognition from TrustFinance Awards
-
BtcDana Wins “Best Customer Support Experience – CFD Broker 2026” at the TrustFinance Performance Awards
-
MH Markets Recognized as Most Transparent Broker at the TrustFinance Awards 2026
-
Belgian pie-thrower, scourge of celebrities, dies at 80
-
Stocks, oil slip ahead of US threat of economic war against Iran
-
Eto'o urges support for embattled FIFA president Infantino
-
Trump claims Iran 'collapsing' as US threatens 'economic D-Day'
-
India in driver's seat in second Sri Lanka Test
-
Noosha Aubel: Kolik administrativních selhání ještě Potsdam snese?
-
Noosha Aubel: Ile jeszcze nieudolności administracyjnej wytrzyma Poczdam?
-
Нуша Аубель: Скільки ще Потсдам витримає адміністративних провалів?
-
نوشا أوبيل: إلى أي مدى ستتحمل بوتسدام المزيد من الفشل الإداري؟
-
努莎·奧貝爾:波茨坦還能承受多少行政失職?
-
누샤 아우벨: 포츠담은 행정 실패를 얼마나 더 견뎌낼 수 있을까?
-
ヌーシャ・オーベル:ポツダムは、あとどれだけの行政の失態に耐えられるのか?
-
नूशा ऑबेल: पॉट्सडैम और कितनी प्रशासनिक विफलता सहन कर सकता है?
-
Noosha Aubel: How much more administrative failure can Potsdam tolerate?
-
Нуша Аубель: Сколько ещё Потсдам сможет выдержать административных провалов?
-
Despair and anger in Conakry after deadly landfill collapse
-
Liverpool must improve on 'unacceptable' season, says Van Dijk
-
OSCE says Kazakh elections lacked choice after ruling party wins landslide
-
UK PM dismisses Russian threats as Ukraine allies gather in Kyiv
-
India declare on 503-9 after Jurel hundred
-
Attacks on Red Cross in DR Congo making Ebola fight 'harder'
-
Kremlin says UK preventing peace by giving missile info to Ukraine
-
Oil falls ahead of US plan for economic war on Iran
-
Springboks change half-backs for second All Blacks Test
-
Millions of Teslas recalled in China over door handle safety
-
Jurel hits 95 not out as India reach 475-8 at tea in Sri Lanka Test
-
IUX Launches New Education Webinar Series to Support Traders’ Financial Literacy
-
Ingebrigtsen buoyed by fourth in Diamond League comeback
-
Dutch say won't participate in 'no longer' neutral Eurovision
-
Kenyans get creative to join manga cosplay craze
-
Kenyan farmers turn to bugs as organic demand grows
OpenAI 'stole a charity': Musk accusations open blockbuster AI trial
Elon Musk and OpenAI boss Sam Altman faced off in a California federal court Tuesday in a blockbuster trial that could have far-reaching consequences for the AI industry and oblige the ChatGPT maker to profoundly revamp its business.
The legal clash across the bay from San Francisco is widely seen as a battle of egos pitting the world's richest person against a startup Musk once backed and now trails in the booming AI sector.
At the heart of the case is an accusation by Musk that Altman drove OpenAI to become an industry juggernaut seeking to dethrone the likes of Google, Apple and Microsoft as a big tech profit maker, this betraying its nonprofit mission.
Musk argues in his lawsuit that he was deceived about OpenAI's mission being altruistic.
"We're here today because the defendants in this case stole a charity," said Musk's attorney Steven Molo, the first to address the court ahead of lawyers from OpenAI and Microsoft.
The company is "no longer operating for the good of humanity as a whole," but as a "for-profit venture operating in the interests" of OpenAI and Microsoft, its biggest investor, Molo argued.
The feud dates back to 2015, when Altman convinced Musk to co-found OpenAI, promising a nonprofit lab whose technology "would belong to the world."
Musk invested at least $38 million, but the split was finalized in 2018, and the OpenAI Foundation created its commercial subsidiary a year later.
Microsoft then began investing and increased its commitment to $13 billion, a stake now valued at approximately $135 billion.
William Savitt, the lead attorney for OpenAI, retorted that the company had no choice but to open up to outside investors given the high costs of AI and that, in any case, the OpenAI nonprofit arm "remains in control of the organization."
Moreover, a bitter Musk, he said, "will do anything he can to attack OpenAI" out of regret at leaving a project that found phenomenal success after his departure.
OpenAI has become an AI superpower valued at $852 billion and is preparing for a high-profile IPO on the back of its ChatGPT chatbot, which took the world by storm in 2022.
But OpenAI's ability to keep raising the capital needed to operate is hamstrung by its convoluted governance structure -- in which a nonprofit board retains ultimate control over a for-profit arm.
This has long unnerved investors wary of backing a company whose mission explicitly subordinates profit to the broader benefit of humanity.
Musk eventually set up his own lab, xAI, which he merged into SpaceX in February. SpaceX itself is valued at $1.25 trillion, and its IPO, expected in June, could become the biggest in history.
- 'Scam Altman' -
Moments ahead of the opening statements, Musk and Altman, who both sat with their lawyers at the federal court in Oakland, were asked by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers to keep social media posts to a minimum during the course of the trial.
In a barrage of social media posts Monday amplified on the X platform he owns, Musk derisively called the OpenAI chief "Scam Altman."
Judge Gonzalez Rogers will decide by late May -- guided by the advisory jury's findings -- whether OpenAI broke a promise to Musk, or just smartly rode the technology to glory.
Along with calling for OpenAI to be forced to revert to a pure nonprofit, Musk's suit urges the ouster of co-founders Altman and Brockman, who is the startup's president.
Musk, who had sought as much as $134 billion in damages, has since renounced any personal benefit, pledging to redirect any award to the OpenAI nonprofit.
P.Smith--AT