-
France readies high school phone ban for next month
-
Empire State Building climbers kiss outside court after viral proposal
-
Trump says to double tariffs on Canada autos as trade fight heats up
-
French poll shows Le Pen's biggest challenger may be hard left's Melenchon
-
Noosha Aubel: Hur mycket administrativt misslyckande tål Potsdam till?
-
Noosha Aubel: Πόση διοικητική αποτυχία μπορεί να αντέξει ακόμα το Πότσδαμ?
-
WeGolden Receives Best Gold Trading Platform Asia 2026 Recognition from TrustFinance Awards
-
WeMasterTrade Receives Best Instant Prop APAC 2026 Recognition from TrustFinance Awards
-
BtcDana Wins “Best Customer Support Experience – CFD Broker 2026” at the TrustFinance Performance Awards
-
MH Markets Recognized as Most Transparent Broker at the TrustFinance Awards 2026
-
Belgian pie-thrower, scourge of celebrities, dies at 80
-
Stocks, oil slip ahead of US threat of economic war against Iran
-
Eto'o urges support for embattled FIFA president Infantino
-
Trump claims Iran 'collapsing' as US threatens 'economic D-Day'
-
India in driver's seat in second Sri Lanka Test
-
Noosha Aubel: Kolik administrativních selhání ještě Potsdam snese?
-
Noosha Aubel: Ile jeszcze nieudolności administracyjnej wytrzyma Poczdam?
-
नूशा ऑबेल: पॉट्सडैम और कितनी प्रशासनिक विफलता सहन कर सकता है?
-
ヌーシャ・オーベル:ポツダムは、あとどれだけの行政の失態に耐えられるのか?
-
누샤 아우벨: 포츠담은 행정 실패를 얼마나 더 견뎌낼 수 있을까?
-
努莎·奧貝爾:波茨坦還能承受多少行政失職?
-
نوشا أوبيل: إلى أي مدى ستتحمل بوتسدام المزيد من الفشل الإداري؟
-
Нуша Аубель: Скільки ще Потсдам витримає адміністративних провалів?
-
Нуша Аубель: Сколько ещё Потсдам сможет выдержать административных провалов?
-
Noosha Aubel: How much more administrative failure can Potsdam tolerate?
-
Despair and anger in Conakry after deadly landfill collapse
-
Liverpool must improve on 'unacceptable' season, says Van Dijk
-
OSCE says Kazakh elections lacked choice after ruling party wins landslide
-
UK PM dismisses Russian threats as Ukraine allies gather in Kyiv
-
India declare on 503-9 after Jurel hundred
-
Attacks on Red Cross in DR Congo making Ebola fight 'harder'
-
Kremlin says UK preventing peace by giving missile info to Ukraine
-
Oil falls ahead of US plan for economic war on Iran
-
Springboks change half-backs for second All Blacks Test
-
Millions of Teslas recalled in China over door handle safety
-
Jurel hits 95 not out as India reach 475-8 at tea in Sri Lanka Test
-
IUX Launches New Education Webinar Series to Support Traders’ Financial Literacy
-
Ingebrigtsen buoyed by fourth in Diamond League comeback
-
Dutch say won't participate in 'no longer' neutral Eurovision
-
Kenyans get creative to join manga cosplay craze
-
Kenyan farmers turn to bugs as organic demand grows
-
Pant, Jurel half-centuries take India past 400 in Sri Lanka Test
-
'His feet are his pillars': Nepal para swimmer gives all for Asian glory
-
Migrants, rescue ships face threats, harassment at sea: aid group
-
New Zealand moves to ban social media for under-16s
-
UEFA's Ceferin tells Infantino to go, but 'not interested' in replacing him
-
Hyundai union back in wage talks after rare full-day strike
-
Oil falls as Trump pledges economic war on Iran
-
Shein grapples with EU backlash, but clients keep coming
-
Yamashita marches to nine-shot win in LPGA Canadian Women's Open
ParkerVision Responds to Court Ruling in Long-Running Patent Case Against Qualcomm
Company Believes Ruling Conflicts with Higher Court Guidance
JACKSONVILLE, FL / ACCESS Newswire / June 2, 2025 / ParkerVision, Inc. (OTCQB:PRKR), a leader in wireless radio-frequency (RF) innovation, today issued a statement in response to a recent claim construction ruling from the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in its over 11-year patent infringement lawsuit against Qualcomm. This recent ruling only impacts the receiver patent claims in this case and is not relevant to the transmitter claims in this case.
The court's order granted Qualcomm's request to interpret certain terms in ParkerVision's patents in a manner that the company asserts is in conflict with the language of the patents and commonly understood claim construction principles, and importantly, conflicts with prior guidance issued by the higher court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit).
Claim construction is where the court may further define a specific term in a patent claim. While a term is presumed to have its plain and ordinary meaning, the court may define it more narrowly if certain conditions are present. ParkerVision does not believe there was any basis for the court to "read in" a limitation to the terms in this case as it did in its ruling.
"We respectfully disagree with the Court's ruling and its recent interpretation of our patent claims," said Jeffrey Parker, CEO of ParkerVision. "The Federal Circuit made clear that our patents in this case do not include what has become known as the 'generating' limitation which was central to the non-infringement finding in an earlier case against Qualcomm. The 'generating' limitation was defined in the prior case as where RF down conversion occurs at or after a capacitor and is clearly not what the patents in this case cover.
Our patented technology performs down-conversion at a switch - a distinction that the Federal Circuit explicitly acknowledged in its ruling last year. If the patents in this case did cover such 'capacitor down conversion,' the Federal Circuit would have upheld this district court's prior ruling on collateral estoppel, which prevented us from asserting the receiver patents in this case. To the contrary, the Federal Circuit reversed the district court and sent this case back for trial on these patents."
ParkerVision contends that Qualcomm is well aware that capacitors cannot perform down conversion and that limiting these patents to capacitors performing down conversion is contrary to what the patents expressly claim and how Qualcomm's products operate. It also does not align with the detailed teaching of its novel technology that ParkerVision provided to Qualcomm in prior business negotiations between the companies which exclusively disclosed switches used for down conversion.
Parker added, "We've fought for over a decade to protect our innovations that we believe have enabled billions of wireless chips shipping every year; and we're committed to seeing this through. We respect the Court's responsibility in resolving patent disputes, and we are hopeful there is still a path to correct this issue. I don't know how much clearer this issue could be as one of the patent claims specifically states that RF down conversion occurs at the 'UFT Module' (acronym for 'Universal Frequency Translation Module'). The patent shows that the UFT is made exclusively from a switch and is never shown as an 'energy storage device' (capacitor). I believe Qualcomm's motivation is that it has represented to this court multiple times that its accused infringing products use switches for down conversion and therefore is trying to convince the court that our patents use something other than switches."
The company is considering its legal options and is prepared to pursue further appellate review if necessary.
Parker added, "We believe the record - and the law - support our position. Our investors, partners, and stakeholders can rest assured: we will continue to defend our intellectual property with integrity and resolve. This is important not just for ParkerVision but for the integrity of protecting all American innovators. Our country has never been more challenged by the rising threat from foreign competition than it is today, and the integrity of our patent system is critical to supporting American innovation to counter this growing challenge."
About ParkerVision
ParkerVision, Inc. is an innovator in radio-frequency (RF) technologies used in advanced wireless communication systems. The company holds an extensive patent portfolio in the U.S. and internationally and continues to pursue licensing and enforcement strategies to protect its intellectual property rights. For more information, please visit www.parkervision.com.
Safe Harbor Statement
This press release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding ParkerVision's legal strategies, expectations concerning litigation outcomes, the potential for appellate review, and the Company's commitment to protecting and enforcing its intellectual property rights. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially, including factors beyond the Company's control.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, the outcome of legal proceedings, interpretations of patent law by the courts, the ability to obtain favorable rulings on appeal, and other risks detailed in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, and subsequent filings. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as "believe," "hopeful," "prepared to," "committed to," and similar expressions. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made.
The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law.
Contact:
Cindy French
Chief Financial Officer
[email protected]
Tony Vignieri
Communications Director
[email protected]
SOURCE: ParkerVision, Inc.
View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire
A.Ruiz--AT