-
Spain demands answers as rail disaster toll rises
-
Garcia bids for Ryder Cup return as he confirms LIV exit
-
Google drags down Wall Street stocks
-
England outlast Sri Lanka despite Rathnayake's hundred in dead rubber
-
Nations accused of undermining science at UN nature talks
-
Starc strikes twice as Australia push for victory
-
ECB says has tools to calm markets as French debt worries rise
-
Does White House ask AI to shape policy? Democrats want the receipts
-
ASEAN envoy ends Myanmar trip with no public Suu Kyi meeting
-
Trump tees up Alaska election challenge over same-name candidate 'fraud'
-
Three dead in rock spire collapse at Turkey's touristic Cappadocia
-
IMF says engaging with Iraq on preparing new bailout program
-
CAR tightens border checks as DR Congo Ebola cases rise
-
Two dead in rock spire collapse at Turkey's touristic Cappadocia
-
Does White House ask AI to decide policy? Democrats want the receipts
-
No surprise to Carrick he's still Man Utd manager
-
French businessman Roux de Bezieux takes over 2030 Winter Olympics after leadership turmoil
-
Two dead in rock spire collapse at tourist site in Turkey's Cappadocia
-
Tech jitters pull down Wall Street stocks
-
ECB holds rates steady after Lagarde says to quit early
-
Alaska governor orders probe into election same-name 'spoiler'
-
US economy posts strong growth, inflation stubbornly high in challenge to Trump
-
Gang-plagued Haiti sets election dates for 2027
-
What we know about Spain's deadly train crash
-
Neville warns managers can need sacking 'for their own good' as Carrick fights on
-
ECB chief Lagarde to step down early, triggering succession race
-
French businessman takes over 2030 Winter Olympics amid leadership turmoil
-
'Horrific' Russian drone strike kills 14 at Ukraine train station: Kyiv
-
Russell Brand found monogamy 'difficult', wife tells UK rape trial
-
VW says 'no time to lose' to slash costs after 5.8 billion euro loss
-
Dubai building that saw city's rise from desert due for demolition
-
Australia lead by 100 after Inglis century
-
Duckett's best lifts England to 386-5 in Sri Lanka dead rubber
-
Martin to ride with broken wrist in Malaysian MotoGP practice
-
Stock markets diverge on corporate earnings, tech jitters
-
England forward Toney to stand trial for alleged assault in June 2028
-
'Horrific' Russian drone strike kills 13 at Ukraine train station: Kyiv
-
Warrican's five-wicket haul leads West Indies fightback in Bangladesh Test
-
Maresca braced for another tough test in Brighton repeat
-
Oil majors reap bumper profits as Mideast war drives prices
-
Ukraine says at least 13 killed in Russian attack on train station
-
Christine Lagarde: unifying ECB chief in turbulent times
-
ECB President Christine Lagarde to step down in February 2027
-
Rybakina secures year-end top rank with Tokyo win
-
A year on, Tanzanians mourn election massacres in 'state of terror'
-
Rains bring relief to Indonesian city weary of fire haze
-
Israel piles pressure on Arab parties as Netanyahu seeks government
-
Osaka vows to return stronger after Tokyo exit
-
'Call of Duty' slammed for using real Seoul crowd crush footage
-
Hello Kitty firm apologises, scraps Japan TV tie-up after China anger
America's passion for tariffs rarely pays off, economists warn
Long before Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" announcement, the United States had toyed with imposing high tariffs throughout its history, with inconclusive -- and sometimes catastrophic -- results.
"We have a 20th century president in a 21st century economy who wants to take us back to the 19th century," Dartmouth College economics professor Douglas Irwin posted on X.
The 19th century marked the golden age of tariffs in the United States, with an average rate regularly flirting with 50 percent.
The century extended a doctrine adopted since the country's founding, which advocated for the protection of the American economy as it underwent a period of industrialization.
"Careful studies of that period suggest that the tariffs did help protect domestic development of industry to some degree," said Keith Maskus, a professor at the University of Colorado.
"But the two more important factors were access to international labor, and capital... which was flowing in the United States during that period," he added.
Christopher Meissner, a professor at the University of California, Davis, told AFP that in addition to these factors, "the reason we had a thriving industrial sector in the United States was we had great access to natural resources."
These resources included coal, oil, iron ore, copper and timber -- all of which were crucial to industry.
"The industrial sector wouldn't have been much smaller if we had much lower tariffs," Meissner added.
Shortly after taking office in January, Trump said: "We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913."
The 78-year-old Republican often references former US president William McKinley, who was behind one of the country's most restrictive tariff laws, which passed in 1890.
These tariffs did not prevent imports from continuing to grow in the years that followed, although once customs duties were lowered in 1894, the amount of goods the US purchased abroad remained below previous peaks.
- Great Depression -
In 1929, Harvard professor George Roorbach wrote: "Since the end of the Civil War (1865), during which the United States has been under a protective system almost, if not quite, without interruption, our import trade has enormously expanded."
"Fluctuations that have occurred seem to be related chiefly to factors other than the ups and downs of tariff rates," he added.
A year later, the young nation tightened the screws with tariffs again, this time under Republican president Herbert Hoover.
The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 is best remembered "for triggering a global trade war and deepening the Great Depression," according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
"What generated the depression... was a lot of complicated factors, but the tariff increase is one of them," said Maskus from the University of Colorado.
The end of the Second World War marked the start of a new era in trade, defined by the ratification in 1947 by 23 countries -- including the United States -- of the GATT free trade agreement.
The agreement created the conditions for the development of international trade by imposing more moderate customs duties.
The momentum was maintained by the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between the United States, Mexico and Canada, which took effect in 1994.
Alongside NAFTA, free trade in the United States was further expanded by the creation of the World Trade Organization in 1995, and a 2004 free trade agreement between the United States and several Central American countries.
During his first term in office, Donald Trump reopened the tariff ledger and decided on new measures against China, many of which were maintained under his successor, Joe Biden.
But despite these levies, the US trade deficit with China continued to grow until 2022, when China was hit by a brutal economic slowdown unrelated to the tariffs.
For Keith Maskus, the tariffs on Beijing did not do much to prevent the growth of imports from China.
E.Flores--AT