-
England captain Stokes says no coasting in 'huge' final Ashes clash
-
Swiatek says women's tennis does not need 'Battle of the Sexes'
-
Fritz struggling with 'serious tendonitis' ahead of Australian Open
-
Sprawling CES gadgetfest a world stage for AI and its hype
-
Zverev admits 'a lot of catching up' to reel in Alcaraz, Sinner
-
Smith bats away retirement talk as he keeps England guessing
-
NFL MVP Allen 'good to go' to extend streak in stadium farewell
-
Grok under fire after complaints it undressed minors in photos
-
UN chief calls on Israel to reverse NGOs ban in Gaza
-
Steelers' Watt 'excited' to return after lung injury
-
Lens move four points clear of PSG at top of Ligue 1
-
Tesla loses EV crown to China's BYD in 2025 as sales slip
-
Sparklers blamed for deadly Swiss bar fire
-
Frank confident he can win over disgruntled Spurs fans
-
Yemen separatists launch two-year independence transition as strikes kill 20
-
6.5-magnitude quake shakes Mexico City and beach resort
-
Tech campaigner decries US 'punishment' after visa sanctions
-
Swiss send dozens injured in bar fire abroad for treatment
-
Stokes urges England to stick with McCullum despite Ashes defeat
-
Yemen separatists announce two-year independence transition in shock move
-
USA Olympic squad of NHL stars heavy on Four Nations talent
-
Milei eases tax evasion rules to draw out 'mattress dollars'
-
France hooker Mauvaka returns after eight-month layoff
-
Nigeria police charge fatal Joshua crash driver with dangerous driving
-
Russia scores highest Ukraine gains since first year of war
-
Guardiola reaffirms City contract as Maresca speculation builds
-
Iran's protests: What we know
-
2025 was UK's hottest and sunniest year on record
-
Strasbourg's Rosenior coy on Chelsea speculation
-
Swiss bar blaze suspicions fall on sparklers waved by staff
-
US woman killed in rare suspected mountain lion attack
-
Slot admits Liverpool's season has been 'constant battle'
-
Spurs forward Johnson completes Palace switch
-
Endrick absent from Lyon year opener but 'adapting well': coach
-
Ukraine says 19 wounded in Russian strike on Kharkiv housing area
-
6.5-magnitude quake shakes Mexico City
-
Tesla sales slip as it loses EV crown to China's BYD in 2025
-
UK sees record-high electricity from renewables in 2025: study
-
Budanov: Enigmatic spy chief set to become Zelensky's top aide
-
Greece and Argentina make winning starts at United Cup
-
Agonizing wait as Switzerland works to ID New Year's fire victims
-
Nortje gets nod for South Africa's T20 World Cup campaign
-
Arteta urges Arsenal to break New Year Premier League curse
-
Norway closes in on objective of 100% electric car sales
-
Dani Alves invests in Portuguese third division club
-
London stocks hit record as 2026 kicks off with global gains
-
Trump says US will 'come to their rescue' if Iran kills protesters
-
Orsted files lawsuit against US suspension of wind turbine leases
-
South Koreans now free to read North's newspaper, once banned as seditious
-
Stocks make bright start to 2026
Two trials, one president: South Korea's Yoon in the dock
South Korea's ousted President Yoon Suk Yeol on Wednesday became the country's first sitting head of state on trial on criminal charges.
He is also concurrently attending hearings at the country's Constitutional Court, whose judges are to decide in the coming weeks whether to uphold his December impeachment by parliament.
AFP takes a look at how South Korea's justice system is holding Yoon to account for declaring martial law -- and what might happen next.
- How do the two trials differ? -
Yoon was suspended from office by lawmakers in December on allegations of insurrection for imposing martial law.
He was then arrested in January on insurrection charges and has since been held at a detention centre.
Ongoing trials will now determine whether both of those decisions are upheld.
"The Constitutional Court makes the decision to remove President Yoon from office through impeachment proceedings," lawyer Chu Eun-hye told AFP.
"Whether the individual Yoon Suk Yeol is guilty or not is determined in a criminal trial," Chu said.
If the Constitutional Court backs his removal, Yoon will become the second president in South Korean history to be successfully impeached.
"The Constitutional Court's procedure holds Yoon accountable for political responsibility," Yun Bok-nam, president of Lawyers for a Democratic Society and who is not involved in the investigation, told AFP.
"His criminal liability remains separate and that will be dealt with by the criminal prosecution process," said Yun.
In December 2016, then-President Park Geun-hye was impeached by parliament for receiving or requesting tens of millions of dollars from conglomerates, including tech giant Samsung, and blacklisting any prominent figures in the cultural or entertainment industries, as well as officials who opposed her.
She was later sentenced to 20 years in prison and slapped with heavy fines.
- How long will it take? -
The criminal trial process takes longer than an impeachment trial, typically lasting at least six months, said Chu.
Park, for example, was impeached in December 2016 -- but it wasn't until January 2021 that the Supreme Court finalised her sentence.
Thursday's Constitutional Court hearing will be Yoon's last unless either side requests another session and it is accepted, Kim Hyun-jung, a researcher at the Korea University Institute of Law, told AFP.
Experts then predict that the verdict for Yoon's impeachment case will be delivered in March.
"Considering the practice of issuing rulings just over ten days after setting a date, a decision is expected by March 11," Park Kyun-taek, Democratic Party lawmaker told a radio show this week.
"If the judges recognise the urgency of the matter, a ruling as early as March 6 could also be possible," he said.
For late President Roh Moo-hyun, who was reinstated by the Constitutional Court after being impeached by parliament, it took 14 days.
Former President Park, on the other hand, was issued a verdict only 11 days after her final hearing.
- What happens if he is found guilty? -
Legal experts agree it is highly unlikely the Constitutional Court will reinstate Yoon.
"Many legal scholars and experts agree that a unanimous ruling in favour of impeachment would be made by the Constitutional Court judges," said Kim.
"Legally speaking the case is quite clear-cut," Yun argued.
Unlike President Park's case which involved multiple moving parts, for Yoon, the issue is "only about the constitutional violations made as the martial law was declared".
But if Yoon is restored to office, it would "lead to an absurd situation," said Yun.
Legally, Yoon will remain in power -- despite his remaining criminal trials.
"It's a contradiction, really," Yun told AFP.
"If the president is not removed from office, he would continue to face a criminal trial for insurrection while still serving as the sitting president," he explained.
"That in itself would be highly inappropriate."
For charges of insurrection, Yoon could be sentenced to life in prison.
The 64-year-old could also face the maximum penalty: a death sentence.
But is it highly unlikely that sentence would be carried out: South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.
T.Wright--AT