-
No.1 Korda charges into share of LPGA Mexico lead
-
Young fires 67 to seize commanding PGA lead at Doral
-
US appeals court temporarily halts mail delivery of abortion pill
-
Joy for Norris in Miami as McLaren end Mercedes run
-
Leclerc offers hope to Ferrari fans in Miami
-
US to withdraw about 5,000 troops from Germany
-
'No going back' for Colombia's workers as the right eyes return
-
Norris on sprint pole as McLaren shine again
-
Venezuelan protesters call government wage hike a joke
-
Leeds beat Burnley to virtually secure Premier League survival
-
Gridlock as pandemic treaty talks fail to finish
-
S&P 500, Nasdaq end at fresh records on tech earnings strength
-
Immersive art: museum-goers in bikinis dive into Cezanne
-
Gaza activists disperse after flotilla halted by Israel off Crete
-
US sanctions are 'collective punishment,' says Cuba during May 1 marches
-
Top seeds Sinner, Zverev reach Madrid Open final
-
Pope names former undocumented migrant as US bishop of West Virginia
-
Delhi end slump with team-record chase against Rajasthan
-
Trump says will raise US tariffs on EU cars to 25%
-
AI actors and writers not eligible for Oscars: Academy
-
Rebels take key military base in Mali's north
-
ExxonMobil CEO sees chance of higher oil prices as earnings dip
-
Leclerc on top for Ferrari ahead of Verstappen and Piastri
-
After Madonna and Lady Gaga, Shakira set for Rio beach mega-gig
-
Trump says will raise US tariffs on EU cars, trucks to 25%
-
Godon raises game to take Romandie stage and revenge over leader Pogacar
-
Celtic's O'Neill expects no let-up from Hibs despite fans' feelings
-
Pope names former undocumented migrant as US bishop
-
Javelin star Kitaguchi teams up with Czech legend Zelezny
-
Sawe sub-2hr marathon captured 'global imagination' says Coe
-
King Charles gets warm welcome in Bermuda after whirlwind US visit
-
Sinner shines to beat Fils, reach Madrid Open final
-
UK court clears comedy writer of damaging transgender activist's phone
-
Was LIV Golf an expensive failure for Saudis? Not everyone thinks so
-
Coe hails IOC gender testing decision
-
McInnes wants Tynecastle in 'full glory' for Hearts title charge
-
McFarlane says troubled Chelsea still attractive to potential managers
-
Man Utd boss Carrick relishes 'special' Liverpool rivalry
-
Baguettes take centre stage on France's Labour Day
-
Spurs must banish 'loser' mentality despite injury woes, says De Zerbi
-
Arsenal must manage emotions of title race says Arteta
-
Nepal temple celebrates return of stolen Buddha statue
-
US Fed official says rate hikes may be needed if inflation surges
-
Fixture pile-up no excuse for Man City in title race: Guardiola
-
Iran offers new proposal amid stalled US peace talks
-
Gulf countries' plans to bypass Hormuz still far off, experts warn
-
Luis Enrique says 'unique' PSG-Bayern first leg could have gone either way
-
Rebels take key military camp in Mali's north
-
Activists on Gaza aid flotilla seized by Israeli forces disembark in Crete
-
Turkish police fire tear gas, arrest hundreds at Istanbul May Day rallies
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?
The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.
But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.
This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.
- Why did shipping emissions drop? -
On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.
This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.
Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.
Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.
- Is it working? -
The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.
Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.
The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.
Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.
- Is there a link to global warming? -
Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.
On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.
The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)
He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.
Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.
One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.
The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.
Ch.Campbell--AT