-
French town offers 1,000-euro birth bonuses to save local clinic
-
After wins abroad, Syria leader must gain trust at home
-
Slot spots 'positive' signs at struggling Liverpool
-
Eyes of football world on 2026 World Cup draw with Trump centre stage
-
South Africa rugby coach Erasmus extends contract until 2031
-
Ex-Manchester Utd star Lingard announces South Korea exit
-
Australia edge ominously within 106 runs of England in second Ashes Test
-
Markets rise ahead of US data, expected Fed rate cut
-
McIlroy survives as Min Woo Lee surges into Australian Open hunt
-
German factory orders rise more than expected
-
India's Modi and Russia's Putin talk defence, trade and Ukraine
-
Flooding kills two as Vietnam hit by dozens of landslides
-
Italy to open Europe's first marine sanctuary for dolphins
-
Hong Kong university suspends student union after calls for fire justice
-
Asian markets rise ahead of US data, expected Fed rate cut
-
Nigerian nightlife finds a new extravagance: cabaret
-
Tanzania tourism suffers after election killings
-
Yo-de-lay-UNESCO? Swiss hope for yodel heritage listing
-
Weatherald fires up as Australia race to 130-1 in second Ashes Test
-
Georgia's street dogs stir affection, fear, national debate
-
Survivors pick up pieces in flood-hit Indonesia as more rain predicted
-
Gibbs runs for three TDs as Lions down Cowboys to boost NFL playoff bid
-
Pandas and ping-pong: Macron ending China visit on lighter note
-
TikTok to comply with 'upsetting' Australian under-16 ban
-
Hope's resistance keeps West Indies alive in New Zealand Test
-
Pentagon endorses Australia submarine pact
-
India rolls out red carpet for Russia's Putin
-
Softbank's Son says super AI could make humans like fish, win Nobel Prize
-
LeBron scoring streak ends as Hachimura, Reaves lift Lakers
-
England all out for 334 in second Ashes Test
-
Hong Kong university axes student union after calls for fire justice
-
'Annoying' Raphinha pulling Barca towards their best
-
Prolific Kane and Undav face off as Bayern head to Stuttgart
-
Napoli's title defence continues with visit of rivals Juventus
-
Nice host Angers with storm clouds gathering over the Riviera
-
OpenAI strikes deal on US$4.6 bn AI centre in Australia
-
Rains hamper Sri Lanka cleanup after deadly floods
-
In India's mining belt, women spark hope with solar lamps
-
After 15 years, Dutch anti-blackface group declares victory
-
Eyes of football world fixed on 2026 World Cup draw with Trump presiding
-
West Indies on the ropes in record run chase against New Zealand
-
'Only a miracle can end this nightmare': Eritreans fear new Ethiopia war
-
Unchecked mining waste taints DR Congo communities
-
McIntosh swims second-fastest 400m free ever in US Open triumph
-
Asian markets mixed ahead of US data, expected Fed rate cut
-
French almond makers revive traditions to counter US dominance
-
Tech tracking to tackle human-wildlife conflict in Zimbabwe
-
Olympic swim star Thorpe to race gruelling Sydney-Hobart on top yacht
-
'Land without laws': Israeli settlers force Bedouins from West Bank community
-
No yolk: police 'recover' Faberge egg swallowed by thief
US to remove warnings from menopause hormone therapy
The US health regulatory agency on Monday said it would direct manufacturers to remove a bold warning on many hormone therapies used to alleviate menopausal symptoms, saying the risks have been exaggerated.
Hormone Replacement Therapy can be taken to replace estrogen that the body stops producing during menopause -- the natural process that ends female reproductive years -- with the aim of alleviating symptoms that can be physically and mentally debilitating including hot flashes, brain fog, insomnia, night sweats, joint pain and bone loss.
It once was used routinely, but a major 2002 study that was aimed at exploring how the therapies could prevent chronic disease pointed to risks associated with specific HRT formulations.
Since then "black box warnings" -- the strongest warning the US Food and Drug Administration can require on prescription drugs -- have sounded alarm over increased HRT risks including of certain cancers, cardiovascular conditions and probable dementia.
Prescription and use of the therapies over recent decades plummeted.
But the matter remains one of debate, and critics have pointed to flaws with the early-2000s study, whose trials were halted as risks appeared: namely it focused on women who were on average a decade-post menopause and in their 60s, when cardiovascular risks increase regardless.
Today guidance generally indicates that newly menopausal or perimenopausal women -- broadly in their late 40s or 50s -- are potential candidates for treatment.
There also are newer, more localized or lower-dose forms of the therapies available.
"We're challenging outdated thinking and recommitting to evidence-based medicine that empowers rather than restricts," US health chief Robert F. Kennedy Jr said in introducing the measure.
- More nuance -
Many members of the medical community have urged revisiting the label, which they say can scare women for whom benefits may outweigh risks.
Others have voiced concern that changes shouldn't come without a transparent review process that convenes independent experts.
FDA head Marty Makary dismissed that notion in a Monday briefing, saying such committees are "bureaucratic, long, often conflicted and very expensive.
"People have felt demoralized in this field. We've made almost no progress in assessing the evidence for years."
FDA officials have emphasized the new label will provide for more nuanced discussion between patients and doctors in evaluating whether HRT can be right for individuals.
Typically women in a low-risk category have healthy vitals including weight and blood pressure as well as normal-range cholesterol levels, with no history or a lower risk of developing breast cancer. They are also within the first 10 years of beginning menopause.
The president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Steven Fleischman, commended the FDA's move, saying "the updated labels will better allow patients and clinicians to engage in a shared decision-making process."
Fleischman said in a statement the change would not shift the ACOG's guidance on estrogen therapy, but noted it was important to distinguish between systemic estrogen products -- including methods taken orally or via patches -- and low-dose vaginal estrogen.
"Like all medications, systemic estrogen products are not without risk, and their use should be based on an individualized conversation between patients and their clinicians," the health association said.
The FDA said it is not seeking to remove the boxed warning for endometrial cancer for systemic estrogen-alone products.
O.Gutierrez--AT