-
Millions may be forced to move as climate change hits South Asia: UN
-
Chelsea captain James has knee surgery
-
Four killed battling Indonesia fires as toxic haze cloaks region
-
China tells Trump's press secretary to visit 'more often' after toilet comments
-
Thai farmers, fishermen challenge IMF, World Bank at Bangkok rally
-
'Under attack' from fragrance, Hanoi prunes its famous blossoms
-
In Malaysia, frustration grows over Indonesia haze
-
Families of children killed in Pakistan school roof collapse demand justice
-
Why India's voter revision drive has stoked fear and anger
-
Asian stocks rise as tech bounces from rout, Warsh upbeat on AI
-
Munster eye fitting tribute to 'special' Foley in Racing reunion
-
Trump's new press secretary says China lacked 'proper' toilets
-
Shooter kills teacher, three children at Oregon elementary school
-
India closes down New Delhi park ahead of 'cockroach' movement rally
-
Fed's Warsh surprised by world economy's 'resilience'
-
'Let us build': World Bank chief outlines jobs-led development agenda
-
Four killed in Indonesia battling fires causing toxic haze
-
Broncos top Super Bowl champion Seahawks in overtime
-
New Zealand star Ponga breaks arm in Rugby League World Cup opener
-
Brilliant Brewers sweep Dodgers to reach World Series
-
Indonesian stocks dive 11% as MSCI weighs market reclassification
-
Brewers complete Dodgers sweep to reach World Series
-
Seoul dismisses Pyongyang's scepticism over hypersonic weapon test
-
High-flying Freiburg try to shut out the noise as fairytale run continues
-
Yamal on song as entertainers Barcelona face Betis challenge
-
Flamengo secure 0-0 draw in La Plata in Copa Libertadores semi
-
Wong weighs haze prosecutions as Singapore air quality worsens
-
The final lap? Two days on the campaign trail with Trump
-
Brush fire prompts an evacuation order along Los Angeles coast
-
Asian stocks rise as tech bounces from rout, eyes on Warsh
-
'Mixed feelings': AI cracks centuries-old ciphers
-
Saudi organisers say 2027 Asian Cup 'on schedule' after attacks
-
Le Pen looms large as Macron enters final months on EU stage
-
Right-wing Brazil influencers on 'mission' to seal Bolsonaro win
-
Three children, one teacher killed in Oregon elementary school shooting
-
Using AI to help find Mexico's legions of missing children
-
Man Utd teetering towards crisis as Man City cloud hangs over Premier League
-
Fiji to deploy solar-powered Australian military drones at sea
-
Trump's new press secretary defends 'lawyer' title
-
Lawmakers Demand Menhaden Cuts Before Chesapeake Bay Science Is Complete, Ignoring Already Struggling Workers
-
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Announces Transaction in Own Shares - October 16
-
Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc: Notification of Relevant Change to Significant Shareholder
-
'Multiple victims' in Oregon elementary school shooting, police say
-
Wallabies coach has 'faith' as All Blacks juggernaut awaits
-
'Multiple victims' in Oregon elementary school shooting: police
-
Ailing UK director Mike Leigh wishes he could make '100 more films'
-
ChangeNOW Announces NOW AI After Resolving Website Integration Vulnerability
-
Pixagram Announces Free Account Creation for 250 New Users Daily Through 2026
-
Argentine demonstration over education cuts ends in clashes
-
Macron warns urgent to strike EU budget deal before French vote runup
Supreme Court Case Could Change How the IRS Collects Civil Penalties - Clear Start Tax Explains What Hirsch v. US Tax Court Means for Taxpayers
A pending Supreme Court petition could reshape IRS penalty enforcement by testing whether taxpayers have a constitutional right to a jury trial before civil penalties are imposed.
IRVINE, CA / ACCESS Newswire / May 1, 2026 / A case quietly advancing toward the United States Supreme Court has the potential to fundamentally alter how the Internal Revenue Service assesses and collects civil tax penalties. The case - Hirsch v. US Tax Court - raises a question rooted in the Seventh Amendment: whether taxpayers facing substantial IRS civil penalties are entitled to a jury trial before those penalties become enforceable. For the millions of Americans currently dealing with IRS penalty assessments, the outcome could shift the balance of power between taxpayers and the agency.
"This is not a narrow procedural dispute," said a spokesperson for Clear Start Tax, a national tax relief and resolution firm. "If the Court determines that taxpayers have a Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial for civil penalties, it would introduce an entirely new layer of due process into IRS enforcement - one that could slow collections significantly and give taxpayers more leverage in disputes."
The Seventh Amendment preserves the right to a jury trial in civil cases where the value in controversy exceeds twenty dollars. For decades, IRS civil penalty disputes have been adjudicated exclusively within the United States Tax Court, where judges - not juries - decide outcomes. The petitioners in Hirsch argue this structure violates the constitutional guarantee, particularly when penalties can reach tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. The IRS imposes a wide range of civil penalties, including failure-to-file penalties up to 25 percent, accuracy-related penalties of 20 percent, and fraud penalties as high as 75 percent of the underpayment.
A favorable ruling would not eliminate IRS civil penalties, but it could dramatically change enforcement. If jury trials become available for penalty disputes, the IRS would face higher litigation costs, longer timelines, and the unpredictability of jury verdicts. Analysts suggest the agency could become more selective in which cases it pursues and more willing to negotiate settlements.
"For taxpayers currently facing penalty assessments, this case is worth watching closely," the spokesperson added. "Even if the ruling does not apply retroactively, the legal reasoning could open new avenues for challenging penalties that were imposed without adequate procedural safeguards."
However, taxpayers should not delay addressing their current situations in anticipation of a ruling. The timeline for the Court to grant certiorari, hear arguments, and issue an opinion could extend into 2027, and penalties and interest continue to accrue regardless. Clear Start Tax recommends that affected taxpayers take the following steps now:
Request penalty abatement through reasonable cause or first-time abatement programs to reduce or eliminate assessed penalties.
Explore installment agreements for structured monthly payment plans if the full balance cannot be paid at once.
Evaluate eligibility for an offer in compromise to potentially settle tax debt for less than the full amount owed.
Consult a tax professional to assess whether current penalty assessments may be subject to future legal challenges.
By answering a few simple questions, taxpayers can find out if they're eligible for the IRS Fresh Start Program and take the first step toward resolving their tax debt.
"Constitutional cases move slowly, but IRS collections do not," said the spokesperson. "The most important thing a taxpayer can do right now is take action on the debt they currently face - whether that means requesting penalty abatement, negotiating a payment plan, or exploring an offer in compromise."
About Clear Start Tax
Clear Start Tax is a nationwide tax resolution and relief firm specializing in helping individuals and businesses address IRS and state tax issues. With a team of experienced tax professionals, the company provides tailored strategies for resolving back taxes, negotiating settlements, and achieving long-term compliance.
Need Help With Back Taxes?
Click the link below:
https://clearstarttax.com/qualifytoday/
(888) 710-3533
Contact Information
Clear Start Tax
Corporate Communications Department
[email protected]
(949) 800-4011
SOURCE: Clear Start Tax
View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire
Th.Gonzalez--AT