-
IOC's gender test directive throws up multiple questions
-
Trump insists Iran operations 'extremely' ahead of schedule
-
Bab al-Mandeb Strait: another key shipping route under threat
-
Families of Kabul bombing victims still search for answers
-
Police detain French ex-cop suspected of killing mothers of his children
-
Venezuela's Maduro back in court after stunning US capture
-
Senegal victims of 'most blatant scam' in football history: federation
-
Former badminton Olympic gold winner Marin retires due to injury
-
Olympic women's sport to be limited to biological females
-
Africa sets out stall for cotton at the WTO
-
Trump's Iran war tests MAGA 'America First' creed
-
What's happening with Iran-US 'talks'?
-
WTO mulls future of global trading under cloud of Mideast war
-
US flexes 'new order' trade policy as WTO meet kicks off
-
Germany unveils rescue plan for struggling chemical sector
-
UK PM 'very keen' to curb addictive social media after US ruling
-
South Africa disinvited from G7 in France after US pressure: Pretoria
-
EU moves closer to ban sexualised AI deepfakes
-
France bids farewell to ex-PM Jospin who 'modernised' nation
-
Belarus' Lukashenko gifts automatic rifle to North Korea's Kim
-
Germany bank on team spirit to end World Cup woes
-
Venezuela's Maduro back in US court after stunning capture
-
French court orders ex-bishop to pay over 1970s child sex abuse
-
PSG Ligue 1 game postponed in between two legs of Liverpool Champions League tie
-
Iran may believe it has the upper hand as Trump seeks talks
-
EU urged to broadly restrict 'forever chemicals'
-
Italy seizes millions 'embezzled' from Ursula Andress
-
Trump says Iran 'better get serious' in Mideast war talks
-
Global trading system hit by 'worst disruptions in the past 80 years': WTO chief
-
EU accuses four porn platforms of letting children access adult content
-
Cathay Pacific raises fuel surcharge on all flights by 34%
-
EU probes Snapchat over suspected child protection failings
-
EU parliament backs Trump tariff deal -- with conditions
-
'Return hubs' for migrants clear EU parliament hurdle
-
Meta watchdog says grassroots fact checks risk harm to users
-
G7 meets in France to mend transatlantic rupture on Iran
-
ByteDance quietly rolls out SeeDance 2.0 globally
-
Israel strikes Iran as Tehran rejects US talks overture
-
Mercedes teen ace Antonelli wants more of the same after maiden win
-
Singer Rosalia quits Milan concert with food poisoning
-
Oil climbs and equities sink amid mixed messages on 'talks'
-
'Get out': Verstappen bans reporter from Japan press conference
-
Leaked Nepal report into deadly uprising calls for prosecuting ex-PM
-
Verstappen says last-minute F1 rule tweak will help only 'a tiny bit'
-
Oil rises and equities mixed amid mixed messages on 'talks'
-
EU to vote on Trump tariff deal -- but eyes rest of world
-
Somalia football slowly becomes a women's game
-
Venezuela oil reserves both entice and repel energy giants
-
Hamilton says more committed to F1 than ever at 41
-
China bans runner after mid-marathon splits goes viral
Rock on: how crushed stone could help fight climate change
From sugar plantations in Brazil to tea estates in India, crushed rock is being sprinkled across large stretches of farmland globally in a novel bid to combat climate change.
The technique is called Enhanced Rock Weathering (ERW) and aims to speed up the natural capture and storage of carbon dioxide -- a planet-warming greenhouse gas.
It is potentially big business with tech giants, airlines and fast fashion firms lining up to buy carbon credits from ERW projects to "offset" or cancel out their own emissions.
- What is ERW? -
ERW aims to turbocharge a natural geological process called weathering.
Weathering is the breakdown of rocks by carbonic acid, which forms when carbon dioxide in the air or soil dissolves into water.
Weathering occurs naturally when rain falls on rocks, and the process can lock away carbon dioxide from the air or soil as bicarbonate, and eventually limestone.
ERW speeds the process up by using quick-weathering rocks like basalt that are ground finely to increase their surface area.
- How effective is ERW? -
ERW is still a fairly new technology and there are questions about how much carbon it can remove.
One US study found applying 50 tonnes of basalt to a hectare of land each year could remove up to 10.5 tonnes of carbon dioxide per hectare over a four-year period.
But scientists applying basalt to oil palm fields in Malaysia and sugarcane fields in Australia measured much lower removal rates.
"Field trials are showing that there have been overestimates of the amount and rate captured," said Paul Nelson, a soil scientist at James Cook University who has studied ERW.
Rates depend on variables including rock type and size, how wet and hot the climate is, soil type and land management.
And measuring the carbon captured is difficult.
The most popular technique measures "cations", positively charged ions that are released from the rock during weathering.
But those cations are produced regardless of which acid the rock has reacted with.
"If there are stronger acids than carbonic, then it will react with those," said Nelson, so measurable cations are produced even when carbon dioxide is not captured.
That doesn't mean ERW is pointless, said Wolfram Buss, a researcher on carbon dioxide removal at the Australian National University, just that it needs to be carefully calibrated and measured.
"There is no doubt that this technique works," he said.
"However, to be sure how much carbon dioxide we actually remove, more funding is required to do fundamental studies."
- Are there other benefits? -
The added rock increases soil alkalinity, which can boost crop growth, soil nutrients and soil formation.
Basalt is both naturally abundant and often available as a byproduct of quarrying, lowering the costs of the process.
Experts note that even if the rock reacts with other acids in the soil, failing to lock away carbon dioxide at that stage, it can still have planetary benefits.
That is because acids in the soil would otherwise eventually wash into rivers and the sea, where acidification leads to the release of carbon dioxide.
If the rock neutralises that acid in the soil, "you've prevented carbon dioxide being released from the water into the atmosphere downstream", said Nelson.
The scale of those possible "prevented" emissions is not yet clear, however.
- What are the risks? -
ERW is broadly considered safe since it merely speeds up an existing natural process. However, some quick-weathering rocks have high levels of potentially poisonous heavy metals.
Scattering finely ground rock also requires appropriate protective gear for those involved.
But the main risk is that incorrect measurements overestimate captured carbon.
Some projects are already selling carbon credits from ERW. If a company buys an ERW credit to "offset" its emissions but the process captures less than projected, it could result in net higher carbon dioxide put into the atmosphere.
- Where is ERW being done? -
Projects are happening in most parts of the world, including Europe, North America, Latin America and Asia.
Earlier this year, a project in Brazil announced it had delivered the first-ever verified carbon-removal credits from an ERW project.
The process is being used or trialled in agricultural settings from tea plantations in India's Darjeeling to US soy and maize fields.
- What investor interest is there? -
An ERW startup -- Mati Carbon, working in India -- won the $50 million X Prize for carbon removal projects earlier this year.
In December, Google announced what was then the world's biggest ERW deal, for 200,000 tons of carbon removal credits, to be delivered by the early 2030s by startup Terradot.
The cost of the deal was not disclosed but a separate agreement by Terradot with a company representing firms including H&M sold 90,000 tons for $27 million.
T.Sanchez--AT