-
Canada crews battle northern wildfire after crash kills 3
-
US Treasury sanctions target alleged drug cartel-linked fuel smuggling ring
-
Portugal's Silva bides his time after being benched at World Cup
-
LeBron James to leave Lakers to play 24th NBA season
-
US stars relish soccer's primetime moment against Bosnia
-
Zverev wins in four sets to reach Wimbledon round two
-
Lampard extends Coventry stay after promotion to Premier League
-
Grimaldo realises goal of Atletico Madrid move from Leverkusen
-
Djokovic, Sinner aim to step up Wimbledon title chase
-
US Supreme Court lifts campaign spending restrictions ahead of midterms
-
Brook ready for "great honour" of succeeding Stokes as Test skipper
-
LeBron James to leave Lakers to play 24th NBA career
-
Taps run dry in Hungarian village as heatwave bites
-
Tens of millions swelter as heat wave blasts US
-
Venezuela quake survivors seek food, shelter amid risk of disease outbreaks
-
US Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to limit birthright citizenship
-
LeBron James to leave Lakers, continue NBA career - media reports
-
Gardner stars as Australia thrash the West Indies in Women's T20 World Cup semi-final
-
'Where is she?' The desperate search for Venezuela's missing
-
Former Barca teen star Fati seals permanent Monaco switch
-
No business as usual after shock World Cup exit, say German FA
-
German rail regulator backs Italian firm in competition spat
-
Pope appeals to Catholic traditionalists to avoid schism
-
Ancelotti shows Brazil his worth at World Cup but concerns remain
-
US Supreme Court upholds transgender sports bans
-
Stocks rise, yen at 40-year low against dollar
-
US Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to restrict birthright citizenship
-
Australia hold West Indies to 125-7 in World Cup semi-final
-
Serena set for remarkable Wimbledon return, Swiatek survives scare
-
Defending champ Swiatek survives scare to reach Wimbledon second round
-
Africa EV firm Spiro accused of torturing Uganda employees
-
US Supreme Court upholds state bans on transgender athletes in school
-
PSG's Portugal forward Ramos signs five-year AC Milan deal
-
Tourists soldier on in Rome despite heatwave
-
Inflation slows in top eurozone economies as ECB ponders next move
-
Record number of 'new millionaires' in 2025, says UBS
-
Starmer boosts budget to modernise UK military before exit
-
UN calls for food, shelter to help Venezuela quake survivors
-
Stocks mostly higher, yen stays near 40-year low against dollar
-
Merz faces mockery over praise of Germany's World Cup team
-
Data centres emitting more CO2 than thought: study
-
Ride-share group BlaBlaCar taps AI for 20-country expansion
-
Over 1 million migrants apply for Spain's mass regularisation
-
Escaping heat, forgetting war: Kyiv locals hit the beach
-
Germany questions footballing identity after fresh World Cup failure
-
Thousands march to demand illegal migrants leave South Africa
-
MEXC Lists Ondo's Tokenized Strategy Preferred Stock on Spot Market
-
Serena set for remarkable Wimbledon return
-
Stocks climb, yen stays near 40-year low against dollar
-
Outgoing UK PM Starmer announces 'record' defence spending
Prince Harry takes on the press - under oath
Prince Harry's appearance at the High Court in London on Tuesday was a world away from the gentle questioning of a friendly interviewer on prime-time television.
Instead, King Charles III's younger son was up against lawyer Andrew Green, King's Counsel, a courteous but relentless inquisitor representing British tabloid publishers Mirror Group Newspapers.
Harry and his American wife Meghan have made much of speaking their truth about their struggles inside the royal family since they left for the United States in early 2020.
But in the witness box of court 15 of the Rolls Building, a modern annexe to the Gothic halls of the Royal Courts of Justice, the goal was hard facts to support his claim of illegal practices.
"I swear by almighty God that the evidence I shall give shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth," Harry swore on the Bible.
Harry's testimony is the first by a senior royal to be given in court since the 1890s. His lawyer, David Sherborne, was keen to ensure the court had the correct form of address.
He was first referred to as "Your Royal Highness" but Harry, dressed in a dark business suit, said he preferred "Prince Harry".
Then Green stepped up to cross-examine him on his written witness statement but not before apologising on behalf of MGN for one case of unlawful activity.
"MGN unreservedly apologises to you for that, it should never have happened and it will never happen again," he said.
The apology is the only one MGN has made. It disputes Harry's claim that its newspapers engaged in illegal information-gathering, including phone hacking, for stories about the prince.
- Details -
Green went over details, questioning Harry on the substance of his allegations that about 140 articles published by MGN titles between 1996 and 2010 contained information gleaned by unlawful methods.
Thirty-three articles have been selected for consideration at the trial.
Had Harry read them? How did he know the information was obtained illegally? he asked.
Harry wasn't sure as they dated back 20 years. Possibly, he said. Maybe, he added, as he explained how he was relentlessly targeted from a young age.
"I've experienced hostility from the press since I was born," he told the court.
It had made him paranoid and cost him close friends and relationships.
"Your circle starts to shrink," he said.
Green asked Harry to explain what he meant in his written testimony that some journalists had "blood on their hands".
"Some of the editors and journalists that are responsible for causing a lot of pain, upset and in some cases, speaking personally, death," he said, referring to his mother, Princess Diana.
She was killed in a 1997 car crash in Paris, while being pursued by paparazzi.
But Harry did not name any specific journalist, explaining that the phrase was aimed "more broadly towards the press".
Questioned about an article from 2002 that claimed he smoked cannabis, Harry took aim at his own family for cooperating with the newspaper.
Green suggested it was legitimately in the public interest, as Harry was the son of the future king and in the line of succession.
There was a difference "between public interest and what interests the public", the prince replied.
"Every element of it was distressing," he said.
K.Hill--AT