-
Myanmar leader lands in Malaysia for migrant return talks
-
Chip industry activists call for South Korea to recognise cancer cases
-
Indian central bank hikes rates for first time since 2023
-
Famine-scarred southern Madagascar braces for El Nino
-
US military on Okinawa face curfew, alcohol ban after murder case
-
How the EU regulates lobbyists
-
Fierce lobbying in EU over 'forever chemicals'
-
I.Coast refuge offers lifelong care for youngsters scorned as 'sorcerers'
-
Dodgers beat Braves and Padres avoid sweep in MLB playoffs
-
Indian central bank hikes rates for first time in more than 3 years
-
Mourning, war and elections as Israel marks October 7
-
Hotel Blacklist Launches New Accommodation Industry Risk Assessment Tool
-
Messi says Argentina retirement is 'saddest day of my career'
-
Bangladesh nuclear plant draws hope -- and worry
-
Oil rises and stocks fall as Hormuz worries flare
-
US beat Canada 1-0 to wrap up four-win international break
-
Pacific presses world for help 'surviving' climate change at pre-COP summit
-
Turkey, Australia's joint COP31 leadership raises doubts
-
Verstappen revival to be put to the test in steamy Singapore
-
For Turkish NGOs, COP31 offers rare space for action
-
US woman who survived botched execution is conscious, speaking: lawyers
-
Sleep, appetite, gene-editing experts contend for Nobel chemistry prize
-
Climate champion Australia digging more coal
-
Nobel Peace Prize haunted by the 'spectre' of Trump
-
Emotion, tears as Messi retires from Argentina national team
-
Africa launches own credit agency in bid for cheaper borrowing
-
Dodgers push Braves to the brink of MLB playoff exit
-
US, China, EU: three paths to regulating AI
-
Crisis-stricken Haiti postpones elections
-
Australia's High Court rules against coal mine in landmark climate case
-
N. Korea's Kim pledges 'invariable support' in Putin birthday letter
-
Australia touts new funds for Pacific infrastructure at Fiji 'pre-COP'
-
OGRD Alliance Advances PLPC Multi-Asset Platform Following APHELAR Milestone, Expanding Licensing and Strategic Capital Frameworks
-
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Announces Transaction in Own Shares - October 07
-
VEON and Amdocs Enter 10-Year Strategic Agreement to Advance Digital Services powered by Amdocs' AI technology
-
Eva Marie Saint, Oscar winner of Hollywood classics, dies at 102
-
Emotion, tears as Messi prepares for Argentina farewell
-
Australia probes app used in cheap smart glasses over privacy fears
-
Kane eyes Ronaldo record after matching England cap mark
-
England needed to 'move on' from World Cup pain, says Tuchel
-
Spain fight back to beat Croatia, Kane adds to record for England
-
O'Neill to stay at Celtic after period of "reflection"
-
Merino double helps Spain beat Croatia, reach Nations League quarters
-
Kane marks 125th England cap with Wembley Nations League double
-
US stocks hit fresh records as oil stabilizes on rising supplies
-
Quebec's incoming separatist leader wants to block Crown from swearing-in
-
As Messi bows out, Argentines say 'thank you'
-
Emmys gala will now stream its premier television awards
-
Ronaldo opens door for Portugal return, apologises for walkout
-
Paramount completes Warner Bros takeover, creating Skydance
UK says sending asylum seekers abroad would cost £169,000 per person
The UK's controversial plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda will cost £169,000 ($210,000) per person, according to an impact assessment published Tuesday, although the government insisted it would recoup most of the costs.
The UK's Conservative government has made tackling immigration a priority, and it was a key promise as the country left the European Union.
It wants to outlaw asylum claims by all irregular arrivals and transfer them to "safe" third countries, such as Rwanda, to stop thousands of migrants from crossing the Channel on small boats.
The government said up to £165,000 could be recouped due to saved costs from reduced asylum support.
London also hopes the programme will act as a deterrent.
The government has highlighted the cost of housing asylum seekers while their claims are being processed, as it attempts to win support for the bill in parliament.
The interior ministry assessment shows that the initial cost of sending an individual to a third country will be around £169,000 -- including a £105,000 payment to the third country, along with flight tickets and administration costs.
But it also predicted an estimated saving in costs over four years of £106,000 for each asylum seeker removed to Rwanda, or another third country.
This could rise to £165,000 if accommodation costs grow at the trend rate that has been observed since 2019, it added.
The assessment warned that the figures were "highly uncertain", and said the plan would need to deter around 37 percent of small boat crossings for the costs to be recouped.
- 'Hardship' -
More than 45,000 migrants arrived on the shores of southeast England on small boats in 2022 -- a 60-percent annual increase on a perilous route that has been used by more people every year since 2018.
Beyond the cost, the proposed law -- which is currently being debated in parliament -- has come under fire over the potential treatment of asylum seekers in Rwanda.
"If enacted in its current form, the bill would leave tens of thousands of refugees unable to access the protection they are entitled to under international law," said Enver Solomon, head of the Refugee Council.
"It would cause hardship, cost billions of pounds, and do nothing to alleviate the current crisis and pressures within the asylum system."
The Rwanda plan, announced by then-prime minister Boris Johnson last year, was blocked at the last minute by the European Court of Human Rights, which is separate to the EU.
The government scheme is still mired in legal challenges. To date, no deportation flights to Rwanda have taken place.
Judges in London will hand down their judgment on the legality of the scheme on Thursday.
Rights groups accuse Rwanda -- ruled with an iron fist by President Paul Kagame since the end of the 1994 genocide that killed around 800,000 people -- of cracking down on free speech and opposition.
T.Perez--AT