-
Trump orders new strikes on Iran over attacks on shipping in Hormuz
-
US man sentenced after swapping 17th century manuscript
-
PSG's Lee set to join Atletico Madrid
-
US launches new strikes on Iran after Trump vows to hit 'hard'
-
Iran plays with fire, but calculates Trump will hold back
-
Taylor Swift fans pay $25 for garbage from outside wedding
-
Oil surges, stocks slide as Trump says Iran ceasefire over
-
After quakes, Venezuelans fear losing damaged homes
-
Meta to build $9 billion data center in western Canada
-
PSG's Lee set to join Athletico
-
Rogers backs Kane to outshine Haaland in World Cup showdown
-
Erdogan gave pistols to NATO leaders, Starmer says
-
Some US Fed officials considered June rate hike on war fallout
-
Nocera Expands Diversified Technology Strategy With Binding Agreement to Acquire an Equity Interest in INERGX, an Integrated Energy Storage and Power Platform for AI, Defense and Mission-Critical Demand
-
UN launches appeal for nearly $300 mn in Venezuela quake relief
-
China sends nuclear missile message as US looks elsewhere
-
US to remove Syria from terror blacklist, in new boost to Sharaa
-
Justin Bieber added to 11-minute World Cup final halftime show
-
Court rejects Trump request to restore his name to Kennedy Center
-
Fery targets Wimbledon final birthday present after royal seal of approval
-
MLB pitching great Verlander to retire after 2026 season
-
Egypt file complaint against referee after World Cup exit
-
Artificial cloud brightening could tame El Nino, but with risks: study
-
Women's semi-finalists in uncharted territory at Wimbledon
-
Shocked and shaken, Venezuela quake survivors get psychological help
-
US man jailed after swapping 17th century manuscript
-
France, Morocco kick off blockbuster World Cup quarter-finals
-
UN maritime head urges halt to Hormuz transit to protect seafarers
-
Amorim hails 'ambitious' AC Milan, promises to learn Italian
-
Trump skips new Air Force One on return from Turkey NATO summit
-
Cancer survivor Traeen takes the long road to Tour yellow
-
New York building that buckled now 'stable,' says mayor
-
Easing Russian Olympic restrictions 'terrible', says Wimbledon star Kostyuk
-
UN says pledges for global connectivity project pass $100 bn
-
'Unbelievable' Kooij wins Tour de France 5th stage in chaotic sprint finish
-
McIlroy hoping for 'home' comforts at Scottish, British Opens
-
Britain's Fery to face Zverev in Wimbledon semi-finals
-
Noskova aims to emulate Kvitova after reaching first Wimbledon semi
-
Zverev sees off Fritz to make first Wimbledon semi-final
-
Britain's Fery becomes first wildcard to reach Wimbledon semis in 25 years
-
Barcelona sets new heat record at 40.7C: weather agencies
-
Korda chases third major as Kim revisits Evian-winning chip
-
'The Pitt,' 'Hacks' lead Emmy nominations
-
Kooij wins Tour de France 5th stage in chaotic sprint finish
-
France lose appeal against Olise booking at World Cup
-
Trump says Ukraine can make Patriot missiles
-
Putellas joins star cast at London City Lionesses
-
Teenager arrested after two girls wounded in Germany school attack
-
Oil back at $80, stocks slide as Trump says Iran ceasefire over
-
Farage vs Count Binface: hard-right leader's UK poll gambit
Iran debates new penalties for veil violations
An Iranian draft law that would set new penalties for women not wearing a headscarf in public has sparked heated debate within the Islamic republic's leadership as more women flout the country's strict dress code.
Since the aftermath of the Islamic revolution of 1979, women have been required to cover their hair and neck in public places, with offenders facing fines or prison terms of up to two months.
But a growing number are defying the law and appearing bareheaded in the streets.
The trend accelerated during the nationwide protests sparked by the September death in custody of Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old Iranian Kurdish woman arrested for allegedly violating the law.
The protests rocked Iran, provoking a crackdown by authorities that claimed the lives of hundreds of people, including dozens of security personnel, and saw thousands more arrested.
Iran's conservatives, who dominate the country's parliament and leadership, have passionately defended the dress code and believe relaxing rules would begin a process leading to profound shifts in "social norms".
But with many Iranians demanding change, in May the judiciary and the government proposed a "Support for the Culture of Hijab and Chastity" bill, to "protect society" and "strengthen family life".
The text proposes increased fines for "any person removing their veil in public places or on the internet" but withdraws the threat of a prison sentence.
"This bill reduces the removal of the hijab from a felony to a misdemeanour, similar to a traffic violation but with heavier fines," sociologist Abbas Abdi told AFP.
After Amini's death and the subsequent protests, society "no longer accepts that we imprison a woman because she does not wear the veil", he said.
Since the protests, authorities have imposed a series of measures to enforce Iran's strict dress code, including the closure of businesses whose staff do not conform with the rules and installing cameras in public places to track down offenders.
In recent days, at least three officials have been sacked or arrested for failing to prevent unveiled women from entering historic sites.
- 'Not dissuasive enough' -
Under the proposed law, the text of which has been published in government-affiliated media, offenders will first receive a warning text message from the police.
A second breach will incur fines of between five million and 60 million rials (around $10 to $120), a large sum for many Iranians. The law would also provide for other penalities, including the confiscation of a woman's vehicle for up to 10 days.
Defending the bill, judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei stressed the need to avoid polarising society, saying he understood the "concerns of believers" supportive of the dress code.
As the bill awaits examination by lawmakers, it faces accusations of not being tough enough from ultra-conservatives, an influential bloc in the current parliament.
Relaxing punishments for violations will see "the expansion of a repugnant phenomenon" by "removing legal barriers" for women not wearing a veil, the ultra-conservative newspaper Kayhan said.
Those supporting the law "do not know that the enemy" seeks to "destroy the family as an institution and ultimately, to attack the foundations of the Islamic system" by removing headscarves, the newspaper said.
Social networks and foreign media, particularly television channels broadcasting in Persian, are calling for "social disobedience", according to some ultra-conservatives.
Within Iran's leadership "there is no consensus on the hijab", as some favour repression, while others "believe that other means must be tried", the sociologist Abdi said.
"The bill satisfies neither the supporters of compulsory hijab nor, of course, the supporters of the freedom to cover up or not."
A similar situation developed in the 1990s with a law prohibiting the use of satellite dishes, he said.
"It was only implemented for a while before it was dropped."
L.Adams--AT