-
Britain sanctions Russian scientists behind chemical attacks
-
Rennes buy young striker Mayenda from Sunderland
-
When politics intruded on the World Cup pitch
-
Russian strikes kill 18 in Kyiv region on eve of NATO summit
-
France winger Penaud to miss remainder of Nations Championship
-
Netflix, Disney+, Amazon appeal French investment rules
-
Prince Harry set to arrive in UK amid security spat
-
Thousands flee new wave of European wildfires
-
Tottenham sign Tonali from Newcastle for reported £100m
-
Norway releases first image of crown princess after lung transplant
-
Tottenham sign Italy's Tonali from Newcastle
-
Stock markets diverge as tech recovery stutters
-
Jolted by Ebola, countries try again to finish pandemic treaty
-
Springboks recall Papier and make 10 changes for Scotland Test
-
Fashion forward: Osaka targets Wimbledon glory
-
Indonesia, Singapore say key oil passage will remain 'accessible'
-
FIFA have 'crossed a red line' in Balogun reprieve: UEFA
-
USA face Belgium and World Cup date with destiny after Trump intervention
-
Fears new pan-European company status threatens workers' rights
-
Oldest quasars ever discovered add to 'perplexing' space mystery
-
'Our game, not theirs': Klopp slams FIFA's Balogun decision
-
German factory orders unexpectedly rebound in May
-
Damage but no casualties reported from Pacific super typhoon
-
Russian strike kills 14 around Kyiv on eve of NATO summit
-
Sky strengthens UK streaming offer with ITV deal
-
USA face Belgium and World Cup date with destiny after Balogun reprieve
-
Experts urge caution as demand grows for AC in heatwave-hit UK
-
Immobilised by heatwave, handicapped man sues Austria in rights court
-
Thousands flee raging wildfires in southern Europe
-
Bellingham tells England to believe after Mexico masterclass
-
Tuchel hails 'heroic' England win in Mexico, but joy soured by Henderson injury
-
'Major' damage as super typhoon hits US islands
-
Bellingham savours 'best night of England career' after Mexico heroics
-
Kane says England found a way to win
-
Ancelotti fails in mission to end Brazil's World Cup woe
-
England, Norway advance at World Cup, FIFA ruling triggers uproar
-
Bellingham powers 10-man England past Mexico, into World Cup quarters
-
Asian markets mixed as tech recovery stutters, oil slips
-
Canada's McIntosh breaks 200 fly world record, oldest in women's swimming
-
Russia launches deadly barrage on Kyiv region on eve of NATO summit
-
Norway dance to Haaland's beat in 'surreal' World Cup run
-
'Major' damage as Super Typhoon Bavi hits US island of Rota
-
Daddy issues? NATO's Rutte sticks to charm to keep Trump on side
-
Australia signs defence alliance with Pacific nation Fiji
-
Norway's World Cup win over Brazil beyond my dreams, says Haaland
-
Philippine Senate trial to decide VP Duterte's political future
-
Neymar calls time on Brazil career after World Cup elimination
-
Australia PM apologises for Kylie Minogue comments
-
Ancelotti promises Brazil will bounce back after World Cup exit
-
KIDZ AI Wins 2026 EdTechX Award and Unveils KIDZBot AI Robotics Platform
Republicans take aim at Biden with 'fact check' website
Just before Joe Biden announced his much-anticipated 2024 re-election bid Tuesday, his Republican opponents took aim at the US president in an unexpected way – they rolled out a website to "fact check" him.
The move underlines efforts on both sides of the political aisle to lob salvos at rivals using the fact-checking format, a move analysts say risks undermining trust in non-partisan debunkers of misinformation.
The Republican National Committee unveiled factcheckbiden.com, a website dedicated solely to exposing in real time what the party called the president's "lies."
"The RNC will continue to hold Biden accountable for his lies, and in November 2024, the American people will too," RNC chairwoman Ronna McDaniel said in a statement.
The website was launched just a day before Biden, a Democrat, threw his hat in the ring for a second presidential term, setting the stage for a possible rematch against Donald Trump.
Trump's Republican supporters promoted the website on social media as the "Biden White House's new least favorite website."
The site appeared to push Republican talking points, with a blizzard of posts mixing factual links with personal opinions -- something professional fact-checkers typically steer clear of.
Remarks made by Biden were flagged as "personal lies," "made up stories" and, in one instance, a "really, really weird lie."
"This sounds like a fairly standard campaign tactic, to set up a website to 'fact check' statements by your opponent," Joshua Tucker, co-director of the NYU Center for Social Media and Politics, told AFP.
"I doubt that mainstream media sources are going to confuse an RNC site fact-checking Biden for a non-partisan or professional fact checking site," Tucker added.
- 'Muddying the waters' -
The Republican move mirrors similar efforts by the Democrats.
The Democratic National Committee has established a "war room" that routinely sends out email newsletters with "fact-checks" or statements blasting Republican politicians.
During a presidential debate in 2016, in which Hillary Clinton was pitted against Trump, the Democrat's personal website ran a live "fact-check" of her opponent.
Clinton urged viewers of the debate to visit the segment called "Literally Trump" to witness the facts – a call that attracted millions of hits in a short span, according to US media.
Fact-checking by professional media organizations was a perpetually frenetic exercise during Trump's 2017 to 2021 presidency, when his every word and tweet – often riddled with inaccuracies – were heavily scrutinized.
Republicans appear to have "serious concerns" about the fairness of professional fact-checking organizations, according to a 2019 survey by the Pew Research Center. Seven in ten Republicans say fact-checkers tend to favor one side, compared with roughly three in ten Democrats, the survey said.
That likely explains the Republican push into debunking.
"The incorporation of 'fact-checking' language into clearly partisan activity could have the effect of muddying the waters on the trustworthiness -- and objectivity -- of non-partisan fact checking organizations," said Tucker.
"If 'fact checking' in some cases means 'this is our partisan opinion,' then it may become increasingly difficult to know when fact-checking really is a (neutral) activity."
P.A.Mendoza--AT