-
أليكس بودي ومجموعة ألمانية يستثمران في 166 شقة في هاله
-
アレックス・ボディとドイツ企業グループ、ハレの住宅166戸に投資
-
알렉스 보디와 독일 기업 그룹, 할레 주택 166세대에 투자
-
India to face Pakistan for Asian Games cricket gold
-
Verstappen wary of tyre wear as he eyes first F1 win of season
-
亞歷克斯・博迪與德國企業集團投資哈雷166戶住宅
-
АЛЕКС БОДІ ТА НІМЕЦЬКИЙ КОНЦЕРН ІНВЕСТУЮТЬ У 166 КВАРТИР У ГАЛЛЕ
-
АЛЕКС БОДИ И НЕМЕЦКИЙ КОНЦЕРН ИНВЕСТИРУЮТ В 166 КВАРТИР В ГАЛЛЕ
-
Kremlin critic Kasparov says US intelligence warned life 'in danger'
-
Plastic treaty talks chair sees deal possible in March
-
Qatar 'ready' if 2030 Asian Games moved back: official
-
ALEX BODI AND GERMAN CONGLOMERATE INVEST IN 166 APARTMENTS IN HALLE
-
Indian pilot hailed as 'hero' after cockpit struggle
-
Afghanistan says deadly Pakistani strikes hit Helmand
-
Asian tech firms stand out on mixed day for stocks
-
India thump Sri Lanka, will face Pakistan for Asian Games cricket gold
-
Flags and pho on show as jeweller opens huge Vietnam plant
-
Woman in hospital after Tennessee's second failed execution in 2026
-
Indian football fans relish rare friendly against Brazil
-
Cash-strapped Senegalese unmoved by Youth Olympic Games
-
Yankees, White Sox, Padres advance, Phillies survive in MLB playoffs
-
Indonesia haze chokes neighbours, but little legal recourse
-
Tennessee woman in hospital after execution 'failed': lawyers
-
Samad launches Pakistan into first Asian Games men's cricket final
-
Cable car offers small hope for Mongolia's gridlocked capital
-
Yankees and White Sox advance, Phillies survive in MLB playoffs
-
Man City scandal risks damage to Premier League's booming brand
-
Asian stocks mixed as positive US data offset by elevated oil, bond yields
-
First-time Sepang F1 racers will master track 'from opening lap'
-
Rice work: Dutch test new crop to save sinking peatlands
-
Japan tightens rules for foreigners wanting permanent residency
-
Russians join street choirs to sing away sorrows -- or show dissent
-
'Happiest moment': China's Mu first woman to win eSports Games gold
-
UK fears grow over AI giant Palantir's health service deal
-
EU talks deportations as five nations seek migrant centre in Africa
-
Empty nets in Latin America as fish flee El Nino
-
Kenneth Branagh examines the scars of Iraq war in 'Atonement'
-
Meidroth blasts White Sox through, Phillies survive in MLB playoffs
-
Hundreds held, dozens wounded as French school protests escalate
-
'Catastrophic': Swiss glaciers lose fifth of mass in five years
-
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Announces Transaction in Own Shares - October 01
-
Great Western Mining Corporation PLC Announces Board Change & Appointment of New CFO
-
US government's new AI chatbot pulls back from debunking Trump
-
California roller coaster shut after brain damage claims
-
US tennis star Navarro reveals health battle, ends season
-
Panama ministers push for reopening of huge open-pit copper mine
-
Panic, anger, tears: Evan Gershkovich's uneasy journey after Russian jail
-
Bohm's blast keeps Phillies alive in MLB playoffs
-
UK PM says 'strong indications' Iran involved in airbase incident
-
US judge accepts Paramount's Warner Bros. buyout settlement
Republicans take aim at Biden with 'fact check' website
Just before Joe Biden announced his much-anticipated 2024 re-election bid Tuesday, his Republican opponents took aim at the US president in an unexpected way – they rolled out a website to "fact check" him.
The move underlines efforts on both sides of the political aisle to lob salvos at rivals using the fact-checking format, a move analysts say risks undermining trust in non-partisan debunkers of misinformation.
The Republican National Committee unveiled factcheckbiden.com, a website dedicated solely to exposing in real time what the party called the president's "lies."
"The RNC will continue to hold Biden accountable for his lies, and in November 2024, the American people will too," RNC chairwoman Ronna McDaniel said in a statement.
The website was launched just a day before Biden, a Democrat, threw his hat in the ring for a second presidential term, setting the stage for a possible rematch against Donald Trump.
Trump's Republican supporters promoted the website on social media as the "Biden White House's new least favorite website."
The site appeared to push Republican talking points, with a blizzard of posts mixing factual links with personal opinions -- something professional fact-checkers typically steer clear of.
Remarks made by Biden were flagged as "personal lies," "made up stories" and, in one instance, a "really, really weird lie."
"This sounds like a fairly standard campaign tactic, to set up a website to 'fact check' statements by your opponent," Joshua Tucker, co-director of the NYU Center for Social Media and Politics, told AFP.
"I doubt that mainstream media sources are going to confuse an RNC site fact-checking Biden for a non-partisan or professional fact checking site," Tucker added.
- 'Muddying the waters' -
The Republican move mirrors similar efforts by the Democrats.
The Democratic National Committee has established a "war room" that routinely sends out email newsletters with "fact-checks" or statements blasting Republican politicians.
During a presidential debate in 2016, in which Hillary Clinton was pitted against Trump, the Democrat's personal website ran a live "fact-check" of her opponent.
Clinton urged viewers of the debate to visit the segment called "Literally Trump" to witness the facts – a call that attracted millions of hits in a short span, according to US media.
Fact-checking by professional media organizations was a perpetually frenetic exercise during Trump's 2017 to 2021 presidency, when his every word and tweet – often riddled with inaccuracies – were heavily scrutinized.
Republicans appear to have "serious concerns" about the fairness of professional fact-checking organizations, according to a 2019 survey by the Pew Research Center. Seven in ten Republicans say fact-checkers tend to favor one side, compared with roughly three in ten Democrats, the survey said.
That likely explains the Republican push into debunking.
"The incorporation of 'fact-checking' language into clearly partisan activity could have the effect of muddying the waters on the trustworthiness -- and objectivity -- of non-partisan fact checking organizations," said Tucker.
"If 'fact checking' in some cases means 'this is our partisan opinion,' then it may become increasingly difficult to know when fact-checking really is a (neutral) activity."
P.A.Mendoza--AT