-
Seoul bounces as Asian markets look to recover from rout
-
Fans in China put politics aside to cheer Japan at World Cup
-
North Korea's Kim unveils plans for 10,000-tonne warships, nuclear navy
-
Geopolitics and AI in spotlight at China's 'Summer Davos'
-
Ghosts of Gijon linger as new World Cup format encourages collusion
-
Race for robotaxi market arrives in London
-
Panama out of World Cup after defeat to Croatia
-
Moana Pasifika axed from Super Rugby after rescue talks fail
-
Wizards choose teenage talent Dybantsa with No.1 pick in NBA Draft
-
Golden Boot battle steals the show at World Cup
-
Tuchel insists England remain on course at World Cup despite Ghana draw
-
Red or green? For Brazil, the politics of World Cup kits matter
-
Bellingham rues England's 'second game fever' after Ghana draw
-
US Congress passes landmark housing affordability bill
-
Meta offers lower cost glasses as wearables competition heats up
-
Dream job: US soccer fans paid to watch every World Cup game
-
England left frustrated by Ghana in World Cup draw
-
Europe wilts under record heat as AC sales soar
-
Grieving Deschamps to miss France's final World Cup group game
-
Rubio rejects Iran tolls on Hormuz as deal strains multiply
-
Two-goal Ronaldo delights in silencing critics after 'attacks'
-
Cubans bid farewell to revolution hero Valdes
-
Morocco squad 'supporting' Hakimi despite impending rape trial
-
Ronaldo delights in silencing 'attacks' after making World Cup history
-
Airbus to inspect 16 A380s after cracks found on plane wings
-
'Paris in this heat is awful': Tourists change plans as sites close early
-
Bolivian government says cleared all protest roadblocks
-
'I'm back': Ronaldo scores at sixth World Cup as Portugal run riot
-
France has hottest-ever day as 'unbearable' heatwave keeps scorching Europe
-
US TV news host begs for info after kidnap note says mother is dead
-
Ronaldo double fires Portugal, England eye last 32
-
Ronaldo scores at sixth World Cup as Portugal run riot
-
Hollywood powerhouses bring AI fight to Europe
-
Portugal's Ronaldo first man to score at six World Cups
-
What is driving Europe's heatwave?
-
Rubio says US will not accept Iranian tolls on Hormuz
-
Spain's Oyarzabal happy to play through pain at World Cup
-
Marco Rubio in Gulf to reassure allies hit hard by Mideast war
-
US Supreme Court rules against man whose dreadlocks were cut off in prison
-
American Michele Kang agrees deal to buy French club Lyon
-
UN to begin evacuating stranded Mideast sailors after US-Iran talks
-
French farmers suffer arid crops, heat-stricken animals
-
Tech drags down world stocks, oil dips on supply hopes
-
Scorching heat shuts Paris landmarks early as France swelters
-
Shootout traps tourists at Rio sunrise lookout
-
Ipswich hire Gary O'Neil as manager
-
Heatwave sparks health warnings across Europe
-
Lake wins Wales captaincy race ahead of Morgan
-
Hundreds of schools close as UK braces for record-breaking heatwave
-
Tech names drag down world stocks, oil dips on supply hopes
YouTube attacks Australia's world-first social media ban
YouTube on Wednesday attacked Australia's looming social media ban for under-16s as rushed, but the government called the policy a shield to protect children from "predatory" algorithms.
From December 10, Australia will require a raft of major social media platforms and websites, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and YouTube, to remove underage accounts or face a hefty fine.
There is keen interest in whether the sweeping world-first restrictions can work, as regulators around the globe wrestle with the potential harmful effects for young people.
US video streaming giant YouTube was originally slated to escape the ban so children could watch educational clips.
But the Australian government changed tack in July, saying young users needed to be shielded from "predatory algorithms".
"This law will not fulfil its promise to make kids safer online, and will, in fact, make Australian kids less safe on YouTube," the company's public policy manager Rachel Lord said in a statement.
"We've heard from parents and educators who share these concerns."
Australian YouTube users under 16 will be automatically signed out on December 10, using the ages linked to their Google accounts, the company said.
Underage users could still visit the website without an account, but would lose access to many of YouTube's features -- including "wellbeing settings" and "safety filters".
Lord said the "rushed regulation misunderstands our platform and the way young Australians use it".
"At YouTube, we believe in protecting kids in the digital world, not from the digital world."
- 'Outright weird' -
Australian communications minister Anika Wells said YouTube's criticism was "outright weird".
"If YouTube is reminding us all that it is not safe and there's content not appropriate for age-restricted users on their website, that's a problem that YouTube needs to fix," she said.
"With one law, we can protect Generation Alpha from being sucked into purgatory by the predatory algorithms," Wells added.
The Australian government concedes the ban will be far from perfect at the outset, and some underage users will fall through the cracks as issues are ironed out.
But platforms face fines of Aus$49.5 million (US$32 million) if they fail to take "reasonable steps" to comply from next week.
Hundreds of thousands of adolescents are expected to be impacted, with Instagram alone reporting about 350,000 Australian users aged 13 to 15.
Some popular apps and websites such as Roblox, Pinterest and WhatsApp are currently exempt, but the list remains under review.
YouTube said it would archive accounts so they could be reactivated when users turned 16.
"We will not delete or remove any of their existing content or data, and it will be waiting for them when they come back," it said.
Meta, Facebook's parent company, has already started deactivating accounts based on information such as the age given when they were created.
An internet rights group last week launched a legal challenge to halt the ban.
The Digital Freedom Project said it had challenged the laws in Australia's High Court, arguing they were an "unfair" assault on freedom of speech.
E.Rodriguez--AT