-
Russia to close branches of Germany's Goethe Institute
-
Indonesia protesters targeted by coordinated disinfo
-
Spacecraft bound for Mercury faces 'tricky' arrival
-
Oil sinks, bond yields ease and stocks boosted after Trump Iran hint
-
Philippines holds drills to safeguard students from armed intruders
-
American jazz singer Cassandra Wilson dies at 70
-
In Ghana, larger-than-life coffins tell the stories of the dead
-
Rare trio of Pacific hurricanes fueled by historic El Nino
-
Menoncello, Reece headline Top 14 new-season signings
-
Chinese WNBA star out of World Cup after losing passport
-
Families descend on Nepal in search of missing tourists
-
Medieval Europe and Africa collide in Sao Tome traditional theatre
-
Far-right AfD eyes huge win in east German state vote
-
Iran attacks US targets despite Trump threats
-
Brazil-Japan to play World Cup rematch at Singapore tournament
-
Alcaraz believes 'impossible' schedule raising injury threat
-
Defence chiefs back boosting US military presence in Australia
-
Alcaraz rallies to reach US Open third round, Sabalenka storms through
-
Nepal seeks climate justice after Himalayan disaster
-
Alcaraz overpowers Faria to reach US Open third round
-
Stocks rise, yields ease as oil slips on Trump hint at short bombing campaign
-
Hamilton hopes to boost title bid with record Italian triumph
-
Brussels Diamond League finals Day 1 - five events to watch
-
Iran, US trade threats after fresh strikes
-
Thailand's 'Jurassic Park' shines light on dinosaur evolution
-
US not 'stealing Venezuelan oil,' energy secretary insists
-
'Role model' Stokes set to open for Adelaide Strikers
-
Farming experts tout 'conscious' food systems to fix agriculture woes
-
Palau urges 'unified' Pacific response to China missile test
-
George Lucas unveils art galaxy at his new LA museum
-
Grinding away: in remote Appalachia, old mills fuel US clean food dreams
-
Veteran Wallaby Slipper targets fifth World Cup after Brumbies deal
-
Sabalenka races into US Open third round
-
Sabalenka storms into US Open third round as Pegula, Medvedev advance
-
NSW's Fourth-Largest City Makes Its Move: Investing Platform Spotlights Wollongong's Health Precinct Plan and 20,500-Job Target
-
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Announces Transaction in Own Shares - September 03
-
Hemogenyx Pharmaceuticals PLC Announces Exercise of Warrants and Issue of Equity
-
Costa Rica Makes History as First Latin American Country to Launch English Learning as a National Initiative with Open English
-
Chinese lucky loser stuns Jodar at US Open
-
Zverev looks to improve after first-round scare
-
US Open under the influence: content creators spark debate
-
Raiders to start Cousins over top NFL Draft pick Mendoza
-
NBA hammers Clippers over Leonard salary cap violations
-
Palantir chief says France's digital sovereignty push 'backfiring'
-
NBA strips five first-round draft picks from Clippers for Leonard salary cap violations
-
US energy firms dominate Venezuela deals worth billions
-
Kane brace helps Bayern win German Cup opener
-
Iran, US trade threats after escalation in fighting
-
Migrant plight, local anger divide Ceuta one month after influx
-
US jury deadlocks again in Lindsay Clancy's child murder trial
Trump's trade math baffles economists
Trade economists were scratching their heads on Thursday at the formula used by the White House to measure trade imbalances and inflict punishment on all its global trading partners.
Handed a chart in the White House Rose Garden, US President Donald Trump presented the rationale for how his administration would impose reciprocal tariffs on partners ranging from major powers like China and Europe to the smallest nations.
The figures presented bear little resemblance to actual tariff levels, however.
While Trump's chart claims China imposes a 67 percent tariff on American products, World Trade Organization data shows China's average tariff in 2024 was just 4.9 percent.
Similar discrepancies exist for the European Union (39 percent versus 1.7 percent) and India (52 percent versus 6.2 percent).
Administration officials explained they incorporated factors beyond tariffs, including environmental standards and "currency manipulation and trade barriers."
The US trade representative published a formula with Greek letters to provide some academic credibility to the calculations -- and one that actually did not include tariff levels as a factor.
Following Trump's trade philosophy, the formula takes a country's trade deficit with the US as evidence of unfairness.
Officials then divided this deficit by the value of goods imported from that country to determine what they call "the tariff rate necessary" to balance the bilateral deficits.
Two other variables were included -- price elasticity of import demand and elasticity of import prices -- but were set such that they cancelled each other out.
Trump said the administration then halved the resulting figure because "we're nice," while imposing a flat 10 percent tax on countries with which the US maintains a trade surplus.
"There's so much wrong with this approach that it's hard to know where to start," Nobel laureate Paul Krugman, a trade economist and frequent Trump critic, wrote on his blog.
Trump's focus on trade deficits reflects his view that they represent American job losses to foreign production -- a zero-sum standpoint that contradicts established international economic principles since World War II.
To most economists, Trump's deficit-obsessed beliefs dismiss the intricacies of the US economy, the world’s biggest, where a company like Apple manufactures 90 percent of its products abroad, but delivers huge wealth domestically.
H.Gonzales--AT