-
NFL to review new allegations against Packers' Jacobs: reports
-
Israeli protesters demand opposition ally with Arab parties to oust Netanyahu
-
Le Havre owners sack coach after PSG thrashing
-
De Minaur upsets Zverev and will face Alcaraz in Vienna final
-
De Minaur upsets Zverev and will face Alacaraz in Vienna final
-
Kane misses penalty as Bayern held by Dortmund
-
German police, protesters clash after 'Gen Z' demos
-
In Mexico City, Day of the Dead parade inspired by 007
-
Fresh frustration for Maresca as Man City lose to Brighton
-
Rubio flags challenges in finding consensus as G20 talks wrap
-
Norris fastest ahead of Antonelli in final Mexico practice
-
Zaman's century foils Sri Lanka as Pakistan win tri-series
-
Hammers boss Nuno under pressure after West Brom loss
-
Bordeaux edge Bayonne to keep pressure on Toulouse
-
'Trump betrayed us': Arizona's Latino voters sour on president
-
Spanish village gathers for memorial Mass for train crash victims
-
Fresh anti-government protest flares in Albania's capital
-
Haas sideline Ocon and give 32-year-old Hirakawa F1 debut in Mexico
-
Clashes break out as hundreds of thousands protest in France
-
Brighton stun Man City, 10-man Man Utd beaten by Chelsea
-
German police fire water cannon during tense 'Gen Z' protests
-
Erdogan takes Russia, Ukraine to task over Black Sea attacks
-
Forced to eat grass, Oleshky evacuees say truce was a 'blessing'
-
Leipzig sink Schalke, Fuellkrug's fine form continues
-
UK police arrest Palestine Action supporters ahead of Supreme Court hearing
-
Germans join Europe's wave of 'Gen Z' protests
-
Harmer and Rabada wrap up South Africa series win over Australia
-
Polish president holds crisis talks after court standoff
-
Senegal kicks off Youth Games, Africa's first ever Olympics
-
Police fire tear gas as thousands march in France
-
Russia says responding to US report of planned attack on Moscow
-
Alcaraz sees off Medvedev to reach Vienna Open final
-
Carrick expects Man Utd stay despite Chelsea defeat
-
Cummins admits changes may be made after loss to South Africa
-
China state TV does not air first La Liga games since Mbappe furore
-
Atletico beat Levante to move top above Barcelona
-
Thousands turn up for France protests amid tight security
-
Chelsea defeat pushes Carrick closer to Man Utd exit
-
Our part of Mbappe, China issue over: Real Madrid's Mourinho
-
Pogacar 'happy to be alive' after difficult Vuelta crash recovery
-
Evacuees from Russian-occupied Oleshky arrive in Ukraine
-
South Africa beat Australia by 176 runs in third Test to win series
-
Kamindu hits maiden ODI ton as Sri Lanka set Pakistan 326 in final
-
Evacuees from Russian-occupied Oleshky expected in Ukraine
-
Aston Villa to take legal action against pundit Carragher
-
UK PM 'open' to slavery apology but not reparations
-
West Indies crush Bangladesh by eight wickets in first Test
-
Kimono-clad pets blessed at Japan festival lacking enough kids
-
France on alert as Halloween protests raise risk of violence
-
Hakimi bags hat-trick as PSG rip Le Havre to pieces
Trump's trade math baffles economists
Trade economists were scratching their heads on Thursday at the formula used by the White House to measure trade imbalances and inflict punishment on all its global trading partners.
Handed a chart in the White House Rose Garden, US President Donald Trump presented the rationale for how his administration would impose reciprocal tariffs on partners ranging from major powers like China and Europe to the smallest nations.
The figures presented bear little resemblance to actual tariff levels, however.
While Trump's chart claims China imposes a 67 percent tariff on American products, World Trade Organization data shows China's average tariff in 2024 was just 4.9 percent.
Similar discrepancies exist for the European Union (39 percent versus 1.7 percent) and India (52 percent versus 6.2 percent).
Administration officials explained they incorporated factors beyond tariffs, including environmental standards and "currency manipulation and trade barriers."
The US trade representative published a formula with Greek letters to provide some academic credibility to the calculations -- and one that actually did not include tariff levels as a factor.
Following Trump's trade philosophy, the formula takes a country's trade deficit with the US as evidence of unfairness.
Officials then divided this deficit by the value of goods imported from that country to determine what they call "the tariff rate necessary" to balance the bilateral deficits.
Two other variables were included -- price elasticity of import demand and elasticity of import prices -- but were set such that they cancelled each other out.
Trump said the administration then halved the resulting figure because "we're nice," while imposing a flat 10 percent tax on countries with which the US maintains a trade surplus.
"There's so much wrong with this approach that it's hard to know where to start," Nobel laureate Paul Krugman, a trade economist and frequent Trump critic, wrote on his blog.
Trump's focus on trade deficits reflects his view that they represent American job losses to foreign production -- a zero-sum standpoint that contradicts established international economic principles since World War II.
To most economists, Trump's deficit-obsessed beliefs dismiss the intricacies of the US economy, the world’s biggest, where a company like Apple manufactures 90 percent of its products abroad, but delivers huge wealth domestically.
H.Gonzales--AT